• Теги
    • избранные теги
    • Компании304
      • Показать ещё
      Разное91
      • Показать ещё
      Страны / Регионы49
      • Показать ещё
      Международные организации3
      Издания16
      • Показать ещё
      Люди19
      • Показать ещё
      Формат3
      Показатели7
      • Показать ещё
      Сферы1
25 апреля, 17:50

5 Best Performing Fidelity Mutual Funds of Q1

Fidelity???s one of the best performing mutual funds, Fidelity Low-Priced Stock registered best returns in the first quarter.

Выбор редакции
21 апреля, 20:40

Retire Well: Investment Vehicles [video]

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){'undefined'!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if('object'==typeof commercial_video){var a='',o='m.fwsitesection='+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video['package']){var c='&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D'+commercial_video['package'];a+=c}e.setAttribute('vdb_params',a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById('vidible_1'),onPlayerReadyVidible); Retirement is all about figuring out how to get where you want to go. What’s the best road to arrive at financial security when and how you want? What vehicle will get you there with more rewards than risks? We’ve teamed up with Fidelity Investments to explore common investment vehicles to help you arrive at the kind of retirement you really want. Retirement planning can be confusing. But at Fidelity Investments, we’re working to help make that process clearer, so you always know where you stand as you build the retirement you imagine. The first step is getting your Fidelity Retirement Score. By answering 6 quick questions, you’ll get a simple numerical score that shows you how well you’re doing as your save for retirement. Get started today. type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=More From Fidelity Investments + articlesList=5878f1a8e4b0e58057fe563f,5878f21ce4b0b3c7a7b0dcf9,5878f258e4b0b3c7a7b0dd10 -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

12 апреля, 16:00

Банковские логотипы: сакральная геометрия

Только ли «фантиками» для клиентов служат эмблемы кредитных организаций? Часто ли они несут в себе глубокий смысл? По просьбе Finparty Дмитрий Назаркин попытался в этом разобраться.

Выбор редакции
10 апреля, 17:31

What It Takes To Retire: The 3 A’s [Video]

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){'undefined'!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if('object'==typeof commercial_video){var a='',o='m.fwsitesection='+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video['package']){var c='&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D'+commercial_video['package'];a+=c}e.setAttribute('vdb_params',a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById('vidible_1'),onPlayerReadyVidible); We all know that building the kind of retirement we hope to have requires solid financial planning during our working years. But what exactly should that plan entail? We teamed up with Fidelity Investments to explore how three A’s can be the key to building a solid financial future. It’s all about the Amount, Account, and Asset Mix. Retirement planning can be confusing. But at Fidelity Investments, we’re working to help make that process clearer, so you always know where you stand as you build the retirement you imagine. The first step is getting your Fidelity Retirement Score. By answering 6 quick questions, you’ll get a simple numerical score that shows you how well you’re doing as your save for retirement. Get started today. -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

05 апреля, 03:00

How Much Money Does the Average American Have in Their Retirement Account?

How does your retirement account compare to how much other American families have put away? We take a look at the numbers.

04 апреля, 18:06

5 Best Fidelity Mutual Funds to Buy in April

Invest in Fidelity mutual funds in April after winning multiple fund awards.

30 марта, 22:00

Кто в действительности владеет корпорациями прикрываясь евреями ?

Сегодня практически всем миром правит одна транснациональная корпорация.Например капитализация Apple превысила капитализацию России размер которой по состоянию на 11 января 2016 года составлял 537 млрд долларов США. Вдумайтесь: корпорации, в руках которых сосредоточены все запасы полезных ископаемых на 1 / 6 части суши, вместе с крупнейшими российскими банками стоят меньше, чем одна компания, производящая телефоны и ноутбуки.Apple - крупнейшая мировая компания. Зададим простой вопрос, кто владеет этой компанией, по стоимости равной бюджетам нескольких европейских стран вместе взятых?Казалось бы, в СМИ четко и ясно указано , что основной акционер некий Карл Айкан, эксцентричный еврей миллиардер, циничная акула бизнеса, известный рейдер и вымогатель, скандалист и многое другое что должно привлекать внимание общества.Однако, внимательно изучив ситуацию, мы обнаруживаем удивительный факт - миллиардер Карл Айкан владеет всего 1% процентом акций Apple.Конечно, стоимость даже одного процента - сумма огромная, но это же всего одна сотая часть. Где всё остальное?Вопрос не то, чтобы скрытый, но на примере тех же СМИ не только замалчиваемый, но и открыто фальсифицируемый .Неужели трудно посмотреть открытые и вполне официальные данные из реестра акционеров? Нет ничего проще, и мы легко это сделаем самостоятельно:Vanguard Group, Inc. (The) 5.68 %State Street Corporation 4.11 %FMR, LLC 3.07 %BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. 2.72 %Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 1.42 %Northern Trust Corporation 1.39 %BlackRock Fund Advisors 1.21 %Мы видим Карл Айкан не входит даже в десятку крупнейших акционеров Apple , кто же они такие эти загадочные реальные владельцы?На первом месте Vanguard Group - для непосвященного читателя, да и для многих экономистов название малознакомое, хотя в любом справочнике можно найти информацию, что компания контролирует активы аж в 2 триллиона долларов , что в три раза больше стоимости того же Apple . Вот такие скромники. Но на самом деле сумма активов под их контролем на много больше.Картинки в СМИ служат ширмой для истинных владельцев что не очень хорошо сочетаются с тем фактом, что все крупнейшие мировые компании принадлежат одной и той же кучке людей. Как скрыть это очевидное противоречие? Все очень просто - надо создать видимость, что владельцев(акционеров) много и они все "разные".Чтобы понять каким образом они осуществили тотальный контроль и соблюли видимость отсутствия одного хозяина, мы возвращаемся к нашему списку акционеров. На втором месте компания :State Street Corporation - владеет 4.11 %А это кто такие?И опять нам гугл(yahoo) в помощь:http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=STT+Major+HoldersИ кто же крупнейшие акционеры у него?1.Massachusetts Financial Services Co ( канадская страховая компания - кто владеет запутано)2.Price (T.Rowe) Associates Inc - 7%3.Vanguard Group (куда же без него!) - 6%4. BlackRock ( до него скоро дойдет очередь!) - 5%Ещё глубже смотрим кто же акционер у Price (T.Rowe) Associates Incи видим все те же знакомцы: Вэнгард и BlackRock( запомните это название, оно часто встречается , идя руку об руку с нашим главным героем)http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=TRow+Major+HoldersТо есть точно таким же манером монстр Вангард контролирует и второго главного акционера компании Apple. Нехитрый прием и десять процентов акций яблока уже в кармане. Но и это ещё не все.В первой десятке есть две конторы с похожим названием BlackRock & БлаБла и третий раз название BlackRock упоминается в акционерах State Street. ( к слову у Вангард таких дочерних компаний десятки - так, что не факт, что мы все их владения сможем посчитать даже приблизительно - даже самые крупные)Естественно среди владельцев BlackRock мы обнаруживаем все те же самые лица:http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=BLKДобавляем ещё четыре процента и получаем уже 14% от всех акций Эпла держит одна контора - Вангард. И опять, это не все.FMR LLC (Fidelity Management and Research), Fidelity Investments аналогично мы обнаружим в точности идентичные названия среди акционеров: Блэкрок, Вангард, State Street и так далее.То есть Fidelity - опять же подконтрольна Vanguard Group.Итого: в копилке "скромные" 17%.Собственно, дальше проводить исследования нет никакого смысла - все остальные инвесторы имеют около 1% или меньше.Замечательная схема взаимного владения и перекрестного акционирования. И если какой-то из акционеров кажется не связанным с Вангард напрямую, то его акционеры - точно под их контролем, и даже в третьей итерации(уровне) будет тоже самое.Вот какая картинка вырисовалась на сегодняшний день расследования. Крупнейшие компании мира- это банки Bank of America, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs иMorgan Stanley.Посмотрим, кто их крупнейшие акционеры.Bank of America: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, FMR (Fidelity), Paulson, JP Morgan, T. Rowe, Capital World Investors, AXA, Bank of NY, Mellon.JP Morgan: State Street Corp., Vanguard Group, FMR, BlackRock, T. Rowe, AXA, Capital World Investor, Capital Research Global Investor, Northern Trust Corp. иBank of Mellon.Citigroup: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Paulson, FMR, Capital World Investor, JP Morgan, Northern Trust Corporation, иFairhome Capital Mgmt иBank of NY Mellon.Wells Fargo: Berkshire Hathaway, FMR, State Street, Vanguard Group, Capital World Investors, BlackRock, Wellington Mgmt, AXA, T. Rowe иDavis Selected Advisers.Дальше проверьте сами. Крупнейшие финансовые компании полностью контролируются десятью фондовыми акционерами, из которых можно выделить ядро из четырёх компаний, присутствующих во всех случаях и при принятии всех решений: Vanguard, Fidelity, BlackRock и State Street. Все они 'принадлежат друг другу', но если аккуратно подбить баланс пакетов акций, то выяснится, что в действительности Vanguard контролирует всех этих своих партнёров или 'конкурентов', то есть Fidelity, BlackRock и State Street.«Vanguard Group» слово «авангард» означает военный передовой отряд ,части находящиеся впереди основных сил армии или флота. В гербе «Vanguard Group» использована латынь «credo et officium» , Кредо (лат. credo — верю, верую) — первое слово христианского символа веры на латинском языке. Личное убеждение, основа мировоззрения человека , в сочетании с et officium переводится как Верю и Служу . «BlackRock» переводится как тёмная участь , судьба , злой рок. The Vanguard Group, структура конечных собственников не раскрывается .То есть на несколько, выбранных в качестве крупнейших, компаний в различных отраслях, контролируемых этой 'Большой четвёркой', а при ближайшем рассмотрении - просто корпорацией Vanguard: Alcoa Inc. Altria Group Inc., American International Group Inc., AT&T Inc., Boeing Co., Caterpillar Inc., Coca-Cola Co., DuPont & Co., Exxon Mobil Corp., General Electric Co., General Motors Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Home Depot Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Intel Corp., International Business Machines Corp., Johnson & Johnson, JP Morgan Chase & Co., McDonald's Corp., Merck & Co. Inc., Microsoft Corp., 3M Co., Pfizer Inc., Procter & Gamble Co., United Technologies Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Time Warner, Walt Disney, Viacom, Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, CBS Corporation, NBC Universal...Корпорация - это искусственное образование, невидимое, неосязаемое и существующее только с точки зрения закона .Идея юридического лица как самостоятельного субъекта права впервые была реализована в Древнем Риме. Первыми ростовщиками и крупными корпорациями были церкви . О частных корпорациях упоминается в законах XII таблиц (451—450 год до н. э.). Во время колониальной экспансии в XVII веке многие европейские страны стали давать право корпорациям вести бизнес с колониями, эти компании стали прообразом современных корпораций.Транснациональная компания (корпорация) (ТНК) — компания (корпорация), владеющая производственными подразделениями в нескольких странах.Владение таким количеством денег нельзя объяснить никакими байками о трудолюбивых мальчиках усердно продающих мясо и иички , даже если бы они в те времена продавали нефть , газ , оружие и наркотики вместе взятые .Такую сумму могла скопить и сберечь одна единственная организация в мире получавшая столетиями прибыль от войн , грабежей и геноцида -Римско-католическая церковь и её самый мощный орден - Иезуиты .Орден Тамплиеров (один из орденов Римской Католической Церкви), основанный в 1118 году был первым транснациональным финансовым учреждением, когда в 1135 году начал заниматься банковским делом.Первой транснациональной компанией была Британская Ост-Индская компания, основанная в 1600 году. Голландская Ост-Индская компания, основанная двумя годами позднее, была первой акционерной компанией и самой крупной из ранних международных компаний. Кроме того, она была первой в мире мегакорпорацией, обладая государственными полномочиями, в том числе имея возможность вести войну, участвовать в политических спорах, чеканить монету, а также создавать колонии .Римско-католическая церковь — сформировалась в I тысячелетии н. э. на территории Западной Римской Империи. Римско-католическая церковь наследница египетского жречества , — старейшая и богатейшая из действующих в мире организаций. История борьбы со светскими властями заставила её выстроить распределённую структуру, сложную в управлении, но устойчивую к политическому и экономическому давлению.Масоны , тамплиеры , розенкрейцеры и др. ордена лишь мелкие филиалы Ватикана не обладающие силой , часть из них попросту существует для отвлечения внимания .Римской Католической Церковью было создано не только христианство , Католической Церковью был создан Ислам цель которого - мировой фашизм (гитлеровский фашизм был основан именно на исламе) .Цель экспериментального проекта ислама - создание новой породы людей без собственного мышления и с абсолютной подчиняемостью . Людей не воспринимающих себя как личность а действующие как единый организм "мясорубки " себе подобных , при помощи которых будет захвачен весь мир (кстати очень эффективный метод для захвата стран с ядерным оружием ) .Адольф Гитлер—"Я научился больше всего от Иезуитского а. … До сих пор, не было ничего более внушительного на Земле чем иерархическая организация Римской Католической церкви. Добрую часть той организации я перенял прямо к моей собственной Нацистской партии. … Католическая церковь должна использоваться в качестве примера. … я открою вам секрет. Я основываю орден СС (die SS der NSDAP),Девиз:Meine Ehre heißt Treue-(Моя честь — верность)И Католическая Церковь и в особенности Иезуиты патологически ненавидят евреев . Их война очень давняя .Первые социалистические идеи возникли у евреев в древнем Риме , а может и раньше в Египте , (судя по истории они всегда сопротивлялись и всегда поднимали бунт против власти , правда все эти бунты были неудачными ). Вот почему для католиков любой революционер - еврей и жид , почему главные враги фашизма коммунизм и революционеры политической системы капитализма , главный грех - гордость и не подчинение . Главное не кровь и не раса - главное менталитет и поведение , так как именно они влияют на генетику . Церковь ненавидит науку , ненавидит атеизм и здравомыслие (посмотрите сами статистику стран-атеистов ) , ненавидит единство и взаимовыручку народа , ненавидит уважение к женщине и крепкую семью . Так как они настоящие антигуманисты считающие человечество смертельным вирусом .Тот несчастный мужик , которого называют Христом скорее всего был реальным человеком , политическим агитатором против иностранного оккупанта , первым представителем примитивного коммунизма . И Ватикан носит его труп на палочке (крестик) , не в знак почитания , а как охотничий трофей на подобии чучела кабаньей головы на стене .Настя Самойловаисточник

Выбор редакции
23 марта, 17:46

Investing Ideas Made Simple

From IRAs to 401ks, the world of retirement planning can seem overwhelming. What is the best investment strategy for your needs? How can you save more to retire sooner? We’ve partnered with Fidelity Investments to help you get informed on all the retirement investment tools to know today. Retirement planning can be confusing. But at Fidelity Investments, we’re working to help make that process clearer, so you always know where you stand as you build the retirement you imagine. The first step is getting your Fidelity Retirement Score. By answering 6 quick questions, you’ll get a simple numerical score that shows you how well you’re doing as you save for retirement. Get started today. -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Выбор редакции
23 марта, 17:17

The History Of Retirement Made Simple

Retirement is a word that elicits a lot of emotional responses, from excitement to trepidation to fears about how to actually afford it. But the best approach to retirement is to be prepared for it. That’s why we’ve partnered with Fidelity Investments to create “Retire Well,” a video series aimed at sharing all the ins and outs of retirement planning. First up, a primer on how the changing economic landscape of the 20th century ushered in the concept of retirement. Retirement planning can be confusing. But at Fidelity Investments, we’re working to help make that process clearer, so you always know where you stand as you build the retirement you imagine. The first step is getting your Fidelity Retirement Score. By answering 6 quick questions, you’ll get a simple numerical score that shows you how well you’re doing as you save for retirement. Get started today. -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

20 марта, 00:11

How Much Money Do You Need and 7 Other Retirement Questions Americans Get Wrong

It's hard to know where you stand on the retirement scale. These eight questions will test your overall IQ and help you track your retirement planning.

18 марта, 08:47

Новый рейтинг от Barrons лучших брокеров на фондовом рынке США

Известный американский финансовый журнал Barrons ежегодно отбирает лучших брокеров США и даёт им оценку. Час назад вышел свежий рейтинг Barrons-2017 У кого нет доступа, то вот полный текст: «The bull market is on sale for online brokerage customers.In the run-up to our 22nd annual ranking of Barron’s Best Online Brokers, two developments topped all others: The three major indexes—the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Standard & Poor’s 500, and the Nasdaq Composite—all set record highs, and six brokers slashed commissions and other fees. At the 16 brokers we reviewed this year, the average monthly cost of trading for an occasional investor had fallen 25% since early 2016, to $47.51 from $63.45. That means more of the market’s gains are ending up in the pockets of self-directed online traders.Charles Schwab kicked off the price wars by cutting its base commission from $8.95 to $6.95, and after a flurry of activity, six brokers settled into reduced-fee structures. Following a second cut, Schwab now charges $4.95 per equity trade, as does Firstrade. TD Ameritrade and E*Trade dropped to $6.95 from $9.99. E*Trade charges active traders—those who trade more than 30 times per quarter—$4.95 per transaction. TradeStation announced that it is waiving its $99 monthly platform fee for its sophisticated analysis and trading engine, and also added a flat $5-per-trade charge to its elaborate fee schedule. And our 2017 winner of Best Online Brokers, Fidelity Investments, also joined in: The firm dropped its commission rate in two steps to $4.95 from $7.95. “We know that costs matter to investors,” says Barry Metzger, a senior vice president in Schwab’s Trading Services unit. When Schwab surveyed its clients recently, more than 70% said that cost is a critical component in investing and financial-advice decisions. Barron’s own reader survey shows that the majority of respondents want to keep their costs at a bare minimum.“But cost is just one piece of the puzzle,” as Metzger says. Barron’s encourages investors to look at the entire set of services a broker provides, including research and education offerings, and then decide whether the commissions assessed provide adequate value.Cost is an element in our rankings, and the six brokers who changed their pricing all earned more points in that category this year. The points awarded there are based on the range from cheapest to most expensive, with the least-expensive brokers earning more points. We also take margin rates and other charges into account, and they can affect a broker’s score. Schwab achieved the biggest bump in its Cost rating from 2016 to 2017, going to 2.2 points from 0.9 points. Fidelity and TD Ameritrade both edged up a fraction. Margin rates rose this year for almost every broker.The rise in interest rates—demonstrated by the Federal Reserve once more last week—can help bolster the bottom lines of the brokers that have cut their commissions. The increase leads to higher margin-interest rates and higher rates of return on cash held in customer accounts.As we’ve written about price-cutting, we’ve received emails from fans of tastyworks, a new online brokerage launched in January by the founder of thinkorswim, Tom Sosnoff. His acolytes believe that the launch of tastyworks, with its innovative fee structure, was the first salvo in the price war. Tastyworks charges a commission only for opening a position—$5 for equities and $1 per contract for options. Closing a position is free.As much as we admire tastyworks, it seems unlikely that a small newcomer could cause such an upheaval. Schwab, one of the largest online brokers, both by assets under management and by number of clients, isn’t a nimble little sailboat that reacts to every passing breeze. It is, rather, a large ship—and it can take time to change headings. The firm appears to have started the process of lowering its fees months before the launch of tastyworks.Not everyone was eager to join in. TD Ameritrade said as recently as mid-February that it had no plans to cut fees. But when its biggest competitors slashed fees to $4.95, TD had to respond. “While we have made a point not to get involved in past price wars, in this case, the time was right,” says Steven Quirk, the firm’s executive vice president of trading. “We had the benefits of a rising-rate environment, the competitive environment, and our integration planning for Scottrade to consider.” Scottrade, which TD recently purchased, charges $7 for a stock trade, so TD’s new pricing is in line with that of its acquisition.Quirk says the brokerage business will continue to be dynamic, but warns against a price war that takes all participants to the bottom. “Firms that try to compete across multiple dimensions, such as price, product, and experience, will inevitably fail to be the best at any of them,” he says, adding that nobody wins in a price war when firms cut back on platform innovation, client service, and investor education.A WAVE OF CONSOLIDATION continues to break over the industry, with the venerable Scottrade having been acquired by TD Ameritrade, and OptionsHouse purchased by E*Trade. At some point this year, Schwab plans to complete its integration of optionsXpress, but E*Trade is moving at a faster pace, expecting its new unit to be assimilated this year.The number of online brokers has steadily declined over the past decade, and fees are generally lower but much less variable. In 2007, we reviewed 26 firms and 29 total platforms. Commissions for a stock order that year averaged $6.35, with a range going from free (at a couple of long-gone sites) to $14.95 (at Muriel Siebert). Placing an order for 10 options contracts resulted in much more variation, from a low of $7.50 (at Interactive Brokers) to a high of nearly $40 (at Bank of America Investment Services). And not every broker had enabled options trading at that time. The 16 firms reviewed here all allow options transactions. Stock trading ranges from free (at Merrill Edge, which gives customers 100 no-fee equity trades per month, as long as they hold the requisite assets) to $7.50 (at TradingBlock). Ten options contracts incur commissions ranging from $4.50 (eOption) to $15 (TradingBlock).Another big trend this year is the proliferation of robo-advisors. Ten of the 16 firms in our survey report offering an automated portfolio-builder and rebalancing feature to clients. Though frequent traders are most coveted by online brokers, growing assets under management is also a key driver of success. Robo-advisors are nudging reluctant investors, particularly millennials, into the markets.Ram Subramaniam, head of brokerage and investment solutions at Fidelity, says the firm “believes the easy access and lower fees for professionally managed money has encouraged younger investors to move from savers to investors, which can help them meet their longer-term financial goals.” We did not explicitly review robo-advisory services for this feature, though having one helped a broker’s Range of Offerings score.Our informal survey of Barron’s readers and other interested online traders turned up fewer security worries than in the past two years. Though the Identity Theft Resource Center (idtheftcenter.org) reports an increase of 40% in overall data breaches in 2016, uncovering a total of 1,093, only 52 (4.8%) of those occurred at banks or other financial institutions.A data breach occurs when an individual’s name, along with his or her Social Security and driver’s license numbers, and medical or financial records, have been exposed electronically or on paper. The only brokerage that appears on the list of those reporting a breach is Schwab, which told customers about “unusual login activity” in May 2016. “We believe someone may have obtained your username and password from a non-Schwab account or Website that you use and tried them successfully on Schwab.com,” the firm told clients.THIS SORT OF SECURITY BREACH falls roughly into the user-error bucket, though. If you use the same user name and password for multiple sites, scammers might be able to access your account. Fortunately, most of the brokers detect when you are using a new device or browser and require additional steps before you can log in. Schwab’s Metzger says, “Our sites use multilayered protections beyond login name and password before granting access to an account. In the event unauthorized account activity is suspected, the user is prompted to answer additional security questions, and failed login attempts are limited.”Mobile platforms continue to drive development at most brokers. Every brokerage in our survey with a mobile app—15 of the 16—reported growth ranging from 15% to 30% in trades placed on phones and tablets. To make the experience seamless across platforms, brokers have, for the most part, made it possible to synchronize watchlists and trading defaults across platforms.That means that when you set a trading default on, say, the Web browser of your broker’s services so that your standard order type is a limit order, that setting also appears on your mobile app the next time you log in, and vice versa. This is most helpful when your watchlists synchronize between your desktop or laptop and your mobile device. Until this year, most brokers required you to set up watchlists separately on each platform, a tedious task that, mercifully, appears to have gone extinct.Smartwatch apps, which primarily display alerts such as trade executions, are offered by 11 of our 16 brokers. The Apple Watch is supported by 10 of our brokers; one (Just2Trade) supports only Android-based watches. Two brokers, Tradier Brokerage and TD Ameritrade, support both Apple and Android watches.BUT LET’S GET TO the real excitement of our rankings. For 2017, Barron’s reviewed 16 firms, each of which supplied us with a large amount of data and hands-on trading accounts. As has become customary, Vanguard once again rejected our overtures. We considered resorting to other means because so many readers are interested in seeing how Vanguard would stack up. But since much of the data we request is difficult to find without a firm’s help, we decided to move on.Two brokers we’ve examined for many years, Scottrade and TradeKing, stepped away this year due to acquisitions. (In TradeKing’s case, the buyer was Ally Bank.) But we have two newcomers: Planner Securities and Tradier, each of which has an interesting story to tell.To analyze 2017’s top brokers, we took a hard look at the value they offer to clients, analyzing security, mobility, and social-media features as well as the depth of their investment tools and their trading capabilities. Our primary consideration in judging these 16 firms is how they work for our readers, who are high-net-worth active investors. Price-improvement statistics are built into our Trading Experience and Technology category.The ability to set up a personalized experience, both on a computer and with a mobile device, is a key area of focus. We want to see how smoothly the system moves from idea generation to trade ticket, and then on to reporting the results of one’s hard work. Customizable reporting is a concern. We think it’s important for investors and traders to understand which of their strategies work—and which need a little more work.Three firms earned 4½ stars, and our winner, Fidelity, was a repeat from 2016. Its margin was a bare 1/10th of a point over longtime favorite Interactive Brokers. TD Ameritrade moved up one spot to No. 3. Five brokers, each with unique strengths, earned four stars: OptionsHouse, Charles Schwab, Merrill Edge, TradeStation, and E*Trade.Because there are so many different trading styles, Barron’s also pinpoints top online brokers in six categories—frequent trading, in-person service, investor education, long-term investing, services for novices, and options trading—to help you decide where you might want to open an account or transfer an existing one (see table on page 34). We also show the brokers that were at the extremes when we calculated the monthly cost of trading for infrequent traders, as well as for those who trade multiple times per day.You can read about our methodology at Barrons.com in “How We Ranked our Online Brokers,” and review the categories that informed our analysis in the tables “Barron’s Online Broker Survey: How the Brokers Stack Up,” the most comprehensive comparison we’re aware of listing the tools and services each firm provides. This year, we expanded the tables displaying research and news based on reader requests. Those requests are extremely helpful in our research, so please keep them coming.Fidelity Investments (4½ stars) wins because of its excellent mobile tools and assistance available whenever you want it. The firm is one of the rare brokerages that maintained access to international markets when others walked away. Now that the company has lowered its base commission to $4.95 and its per contract options fee to 65 cents, Fidelity’s full suite of tools and services is also a terrific value.Fidelity is leading the way in making the quality of its trade executions more transparent. We’re fans of the Fidelity report that displays after every execution showing how much price improvement its trading engine generated.As one of the three brokers that participate in the Financial Information Forum’s voluntary extended reporting program, which is working to standardize execution quality reports (the others are Schwab and Scottrade), the firm also puts out quarterly reports that show the percentage of orders that were price-improved, and the average savings per order. In the fourth quarter of 2016, a 500-to-1,000 share order of a stock listed on the S&P 500 attained an average savings of $10.25 per order at Fidelity. That gives you more back in price improvement than you pay in commissions.On its Website and in mobile apps, Fidelity’s design mandate is to create a unified customer experience, so that you don’t feel like you’re in a different universe on your tablet compared with your desktop.Its exchange-traded-fund screener now includes technical pattern recognition powered by Recognia, which lets you look for particular price events, such as a moving average crossover or, perhaps, a bullish engulfing line for candlestick enthusiasts. The screener will display all of the technical events you’ve chosen, then narrow down the choices further by fundamental items, such as market capitalization, or pricing characteristics such as volatility. Fidelity also has an ETF Compare tool, which shows you similar funds and lets you compare them side by side. ETFs that trade commission-free—91 in all at Fidelity—are indicated with an icon.Fidelity has made a concerted effort to go after the millennial market, including repackaging educational content onto its mobile site. There are 12 programs available now, with more being added monthly. The Planning and Guidance center is designed to allow customers to focus on the future, planning for any kind of goal from college tuition to retirement to taking a long vacation. Fidelity Go, the firm’s robo-advisory service, is clearly aimed at the younger set.Fidelity has also added a site that allows guest access for 30 days and includes its premium research. When the 30 days are up, you can decide whether to open an account.Interactive Brokers (4½ stars) maintains its position near the top of the charts. IB is aiming at more than just the hyperactive trader these days. In order to ease a new customer onto its flagship trading platform, the downloadable Trader Workstation, or TWS, IB has launched a layout library that includes 20 predefined setups for different styles of trading. There are templates for options traders, fundamental research, and traders who focus on the news. You can set up as many layouts as you’d like and switch among them using the tabs at the bottom of the screen.To keep from getting lost in the complexity of the Trader Workstation, IB introduced an artificial-intelligence-enabled assistant named IBot, which responds to plain English questions. IBot can answer queries about price quotes, option chains, order placement, upcoming corporate events, and market activity, among other things.The trader’s journal has been enhanced significantly, allowing you to organize your notes by underlying symbol so you can see all of your notes in one streaming view. These notes are stored on IB’s server, so you can access them whether you’re using the desktop, Web, or mobile version of the platform.IB also offers 10 low-fee robo-advisory portfolios from its Covestor Smart Beta Portfolios unit. The portfolios combine automated investing with human oversight, and their risk-return profiles are potentially more profitable than passive index trackers. Rather than being invested in ETFs, the portfolios, which are rebalanced quarterly, include a wide range of individual stocks. The minimum investment is $5,000, and the portfolios may include fractional shares of some of the stocks. Fees top out at 0.08%.TD Ameritrade (4½ stars) moved up into the top three this year by enhancing each of its platforms. On the Web, the experience of analyzing stocks has become more personalized in the My Stocks Overview section of its research section. The firm’s thinkorswim platform added global indexes to the charting package, as well as Federal Reserve data. Technical traders can use an enhanced scanner, which looks for classic and candlestick patterns. You can even set up a scan graphically, by dragging and dropping components into the tool.One of the creature comforts we appreciate is the way TD watchlists can be generated quickly from the output of a screener and then made available to all platforms—including mobile. You can have a multiscreen setup that includes your mobile devices, and all of your data and watchlists are instantly synchronized.The designer crew at TD has made thoughtful changes to the mobile experience, including the way long watchlists are sorted on smaller devices. Some other brokers don’t allow you to access real-time streaming data on multiple devices simultaneously, mainly because of the cost of supplying the data. “We’re good at negotiating with data providers,” notes a technical manager at the firm. With 20% of trades occurring on mobile devices, the focus on mobile is appropriate.Over the past year, TD launched its own robo-advisory service, Essential Portfolios, via its advisory affiliate, TD Ameritrade Investment Management. Goal-setting is a key piece of this service, with five diversified model portfolios recommended by Morningstar. Slider bars allow the client to make adjustments at any point in the investing cycle, and display the updated results. For clients who are not projected to hit their targets, up to three tips are presented to help them get back on track.OptionsHouse (4 stars), which was acquired last year by E*Trade, continues to operate as a separate entity but will be integrated into a single platform this year. The combined firms are targeting the summer for the completion of the process, which will offer the OptionsHouse platform to E*Trade customers, and vice versa. OptionsHouse’s Steve Claussen assures us that the platform will not be going away, and will be developing additional tools for analyzing and trading futures. When the merger is complete, OptionsHouse customers will be able to utilize E*Trade’s extensive education offerings as well as its recently-launched robo-advisory.On the mobile front, OptionsHouse launched two new native mobile apps in 2016, and is currently rolling out a new HTML5 application that can run on any device, from desktop to smartphone. The new layout is extremely flexible, and the design team worked to reduce the number of clicks and taps that it takes to get around, and to provide more functionality for active traders. Options chains displays snap onto the screen. When placing an options order, data for the underlying stock continue to stream, keeping the trader up to date during the process of crafting a spread.The platform has switched from a proprietary charting package to one powered by third party Chart IQ, which has given OptionsHouse additional technical studies as well as fundamental data (dividends, earnings, splits) that display on a chart.On mobile, the platform has been redesigned so that it can be operated with one hand, either right or left, for quick access to quotes and trading. The mobile options chain uses a tumbler for choosing strikes and dates rather than long drop-down menus. There are multiple trade analysis tools on both mobile and the HTML5 platform to make sure you know the probability of success.Charles Schwab (4 stars) continues to pull tools from optionsXpress into its flagship Web platform, and in the last year has invested into its trading infrastructure to support those tools. Once the integration is complete, Schwab will offer portfolio margining, which will be a benefit to active traders who use options to mitigate risk. Idea generation functions, including Trade Source, a gain/loss analyzer, have also been added to the Website.The site has also been enhanced with additional personalization, such as a customizable opening view with widgets that can be dropped into the display. Once you’ve updated this view on the Web, it follows you to your mobile app. For active traders, StreetSmart Edge added quite a few options tools, including a nicely laid-out trading workflow. A probability calculator is built into the trade ticket. When viewing account positions, you can resubmit, close, or roll out a position into a future strike with minimal effort.One area where Schwab has made a big push is transparency around order execution and quality. The firm has introduced a new order routing system that allows it to make direct comparisons of quality across execution venues. During the fourth quarter of 2016, this new system ensured that 98.4% of shares traded in the 500-1,999 share bucket were executed at the current market quote or better, and the average savings per order was $11.29. This focus on execution quality is most welcome.Schwab’s robo-advisory service, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, managed to amass $12.3 billion in assets by the end of 2016, which is an incredible figure for a service that launched in 2015. The firm has added another level of financial planning, Schwab Intelligent Advisory, which combines professional advisors with automated portfolios. Performance details are displayed upon logging in to the Website or the mobile apps.Merrill Edge (4 stars) found that about 50% of its customers who are using its mobile apps are mobile only, so it pushed to enrich the experience on smartphones and tablets. The apps now include a Dashboard feature that displays your portfolio, and quite a bit of information related to your holdings such as corporate events, ratings changes, and news. The events are presented based on how recently they occurred, and how impactful they are to your portfolio.When placing a trade on a mobile app, the entire process can be done on a single page rather than swiping back and forth. There is also quite a bit of customizable research and education content that can be viewed on mobile. The charting function is slick – when you switch to landscape mode on your device, the charts are fully interactive, which includes indicators, event markers, and comparisons to peers, indexes, or sectors. Store the template and use it again for a different symbol. There was also an emphasis on long-term investing on mobile, integrating goal planning content with self-service functions. In April, there will be a suite of mobile education modules through a partnership with Morningstar.Back on the Website, an options strategy builder has been launched, which helps a customer filter strategies by market outlook and volatility expectations. The options order entry screen was updated as well. The MarketPro platform includes the OptionsPlay toolkit as well as Recognia’s pattern recognition.Life events drive the planning and goal-setting capabilities of the platform. More than 20 life events, such as getting married, sending a child to college, buying a house, or retiring are included. Merrill has been baking in an enterprise-wide approach to helping clients meet their goals with varying levels of assistance from completely self-directed to advisor managed. Merrill Edge Guided Investing is the firm’s robo-advisory, which makes it possible to restrict the ETFs that will be included in the account. Customers with a Bank of America relationship, whether checking, savings, mortgage, or credit card, can see a unified view of all accounts from Merrill Edge. You’ll find financial advisors in almost every Bank of America branch.TradeStation (4 stars) dropped its $99 monthly platform fee, and added a $5 flat rate commission, which could be more appealing to less active traders. All customers will be able to access the firm’s RadarScreen tool for no extra charge as well. GainsKeeper, a tax management system, has been integrated to make April a less cruel month. Other enhancements include an Intraday Short Locate app to allow short sellers to find shares to borrow. When viewing quote detail on a particular stock, you’ll be able to see an “easy to borrow” or “hard to borrow” indicator. Several algorithms for managing large block trades have also been published.OptionsStation Pro is also available to all customers for no additional fee, and it has been simplified considerably in the last year. At the bottom of the options chain screen are four tabs rather than the previous 12, with access to trading, analysis, position management, and search. When viewing an options chain, as you click on a bid or ask, a spread gets built. The platform recognizes the spread you are building, or you can click on a drop-down menu to start with a particular strategy. The Analyze tab displays a profit/loss graph, while the manage tab lets you quickly roll a strategy out, or add legs.On mobile devices, options chain displays were expanded, including Greeks calculations. Conditional order types were enabled on mobile, as well as the ability to close all positions with a click.The firm added a huge amount of content to its educational offerings, with resources that address all asset classes and skill levels. There are live Webinars every day the market is open, including those on strategy trading, daily market intelligence, and “I Want To Be A Trader” sessions for novices. The platform is ideal for technical analysis junkies, and for those who want to build their own trading system.E*Trade (4 stars) rolled out its new Portfolio display last fall, which offers a much cleaner layout with easier access to additional functionality. The aim was to allow customers to get more tasks done without having to leave the page, which was a most welcome update. The entire navigation experience was overhauled and simplified; as a result, the Website feels much cleaner and up-to-date. The Estimated Income tool was overhauled, giving customers a clearer picture of how their portfolios are generating income with a customizable time frame and the ability to seek out additional income.E*Trade Pro’s charting package was significantly enhanced as well, including 110 technical and fundamental studies and comparison tools. The charts created in E*Trade Pro can also be loaded in the mobile apps, which is a welcome cross-platform integration.With the acquisition of OptionsHouse, E*Trade will be able to offer additional options analytics and trading functionality later this year. E*Trade launched its own robo-advisor, Adaptive Portfolio, in mid-year, which allows combinations of actively and passively managed ETFs and mutual funds. Portfolio analysis functions look similar when viewing a robo-generated portfolio or your regular portfolio in terms of asset allocation. The firm offers three other managed solutions with higher initial minimums.Tradier (3½ stars) is an interesting animal. This is its first year in our survey since its founding in 2012, and what it provide is essentially a trading engine and a back office management system to which third- party developers can attach a front end. So it’s hard to review when compared to the others in the story since there are so many possibilities inherent in this model. There are currently about 100 developers who partner with Tradier, including eSignal, Quantcha, Mobile Interactive and MissingStep. CEO Stephen Ehrlich, an industry veteran, joined the firm in May and says it plans to add another 100 providers and build its own front end this year. Ehrlich also said that it is about to announce an acquisition but was not ready to reveal the target when we went to press.Customers can use any front end they’d like, and subscribe to multiple partners. Since all account settings and data are stored in the cloud, you could use Livevol Core for your options trading and analysis, and then switch over to Technician for chart-based analysis and trading. Mobile apps are dependent on the partner. Most of the partners charge a subscription fee that is often waived based on trading activity.The platform earns 3½ stars based on its flexibility and pricing. In April, Tradier will offer its customers monthly flat fee possibilities for unlimited trading: $19.95 for equities, and $99 for options. Currently the flat fee is available through a handful of partners including EF Hutton (the direct investment platform that owns the storied name), Chart IQ, Equities.com, and Key2Options. Very frequent traders could save a lot of money using these flat fees.Lightspeed Trading (3½ stars) spent the first half of 2016 focusing on its small institutional clients, but turned back to the retail and active trader space in the second half of the year. One of its goals was to provide more content to clients, which resulted in a partnership with TipRanks, which lets you evaluate analyst and blogger recommendations, and includes a real-time feed of analyst updates. There were also some cosmetic enhancements to the order entry process, making it simpler.For options traders, Lightspeed customers can access the Livevol options scanner for free, which can otherwise cost you $100 per month. A smart order router for complex options trades was also implemented this year. The platform performed very reliably during the whirlwind trading episodes experienced over the last year. It’s worth a look for the very active trader or hedge fund.SogoTrade (3 stars) redesigned their Website in the last year, making navigation much simpler. They also put the entire account application process online, which saves international applicants a lot of time since they no longer need to print out, sign, and mail the new account forms. There were also enhancements made to the API, allowing developers and institutional customers to connect their own front end to the SogoTrade engine. OptionsPlay has been fully integrated; clicking on Trade once a spread has been chosen by the investor populates a trade ticket. “About 75% of our customers trade options,” reports Senior Vice President Kris Wallace.The firm is making a conscious effort to attract cost-conscious customers who don’t want to be swallowed up by one of the larger firms. So they are offering 100 free trades for new clients for the first 30 days after an account is opened. They also offer their lowest pricing tier, $3 per equity trade, to customers who transfer $10,000 or more into a new account. With offices in Taiwan, the firm caters to Chinese-speaking traders.SogoTrade’s parent company acquired MarketRiders this month, one of the early entrants in the robo-advisory space. Wallace says, “The days of 1% and greater advisory fees are coming to a close. A large and growing percentage of the under-40 age demographic demands mobile access to advanced portfolio asset allocation models at competitive pricing.”eOption (3 stars) completed the launch of its new desktop and mobile trading platforms in 2016, which includes enhanced research and improved charting technology and increased security. The mobile platform is moving closer to the desktop in terms of functionality, but remains a different experience for now. The firm’s guiding light with new development is now “mobile first,” and they are making sure that all new features will be delivered to iOS and Android platforms simultaneously with the desktop. Watch lists and other features sync across platforms.Social media sharing has been enabled in the platform, allowing customers to share articles to a variety of venues. The charting platform has been enhanced, and displays entry and exit points for your trades. When placing a trade, all commissions and fees are explicitly spelled out, including regulatory fees, so there are no surprises.The big advantage to eOption is the ability to trade enormous spreads at low cost. This firm is by far the least expensive choice for heavy options traders, and the enhancements to the platform make it easy to build spreads quickly.Firstrade (3 stars) focused on enhancing its options platform over the last year, adding support for 3- and 4-legged strategies. The ability to roll a strategy forward was added as part of this upgrade, as was a rewrite of the buying power and risk engine to provide additional funds for purchase of securities for those using margin.The firm was one of the six cutting its commissions this winter, and is now even with Schwab and Fidelity at $4.95 for equities. Firstrade remains committed to providing real-time streaming data, high quality market information, and research. It also has multilingual customer service representatives available to provide live help. CEO John Liu says, “We believe it is vital that customers are able to reach out to a real person when they have questions about their money.”Firstrade is seeing trades on its mobile platform grow to 25% of all transactions placed, and expects to see 30% by the end of the year. They are launching a new mobile app later this year, and expect the number of mobile users to increase significantly across the industry.Just2Trade (2 stars) streamlined its Website and enhanced their mobile apps over the last year. Just2Trade’s fees are very low, at $2.50 per stock trade, but the firm does not offer access to mutual funds or bonds. The Web-based trading application has streaming data with stock and options trading functionality that is relatively basic compared to others in the survey. Tabs offering access to charts and trading ideas open new windows that access third-party Websites, including advanced charting under the TradeX banner and trading ideas on BestTrades.For more advanced trading and analytical capabilities, you can access your Just2Trade account through several third-party applications, though you’ll pay additional fees. These include the recently-added MetaTrade, Sterling Trader Pro, OEC Trader and CQG Trader. The mobile futures trading platform, iBroker, is also available.Trading Block (2 stars) had a fairly quiet year in 2016 as most of the firm’s focus was on rebuilding its middleware to better serve its network of registered independent advisors and brokers. The long-scheduled revamp of the client-facing front end will take place this year. Trading Block’s score suffers because they do not offer a mobile trading platform yet, and fees are on the high side after all the other price cuts.TradingBlock’s suite of proprietary scanners, which include TradeBuilder and Portfolio Hedger for free, allow you to look for options strategies and collar strategies to protect existing stock or ETF positions. You can add EdgeFinder for $199/month, which is a real-time customizable scanner that analyzes over 30 different variables to locate potential trades. It also has a method for finding mispriced contracts, which can result in more profitable trades.Planner Securities (2 stars) focuses on bringing foreign accounts to the U.S. markets. Its current big push is into Brazil, but the firm is also present in Russia, Ireland, and Bulgaria. The platform offers research on Brazilian ADRs, and also automatically opens an iBillionaire robo-advisory account for every new customer. “If you trade, allocate 10% of the commissions generated and put them into the robo,” says Humberto Santos, Planner Securities’ managing director.The trading platform is AlphaPlan, which is a flexible Web-based application. The firm’s investment banking side also provides private equity, and offers management and financial advisory services to professional soccer players from Brazil and elsewhere.

17 марта, 09:50

Почему SpaceX побеждает Россию в сфере коммерческих пусков ракет

Смена администрации президента США по времени совпала с формированием новых контуров рынка коммерческих космических услуг. Основные ожидания здесь связаны с американскими компаниями SpaceX, Blue Origin, ULA (United Launch Alliance, совместное предприятие аэрокосмических гигантов Lockheed Martin и Boeing) и, в меньшей степени, Orbital ATK, а также Sierra Nevada.

07 марта, 15:32

Самые успешные женщины-инвесторы в мире

В преддверии Международного женского дня портал по финансовой грамотности Investopedia составил рэнкинг наиболее успешных женщин в области инвестиций. Итак, встречайте.

02 марта, 00:48

Brokerage Stocks Plunge as Price War Intensifies

Cost of investing continues to decline, as major brokerage firms reduce fees to attract potential clients.

01 марта, 00:16

Fidelity and Schwab Slash Prices as Trading Fee Race Heats Up

Online brokerage firm Fidelity Investments announced Tuesday its plans to cut costs nearly in half to $4.95 from $7.95 for online trade commissions for U.S. stocks and ETFs. Since the announcement, Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW) already climbed back to even in the race to lower prices by matching Fidelity???s new sub-$5.00 mark.

28 февраля, 12:01

Want to Retire Early? Here Are 14 Signs It Will Probably Happen to You

Are you anxious to quit your job for good? Here are a few ways to decide whether you will be able to retire early and get a jump start on your golden years.

Выбор редакции
28 февраля, 08:04

Brokerages' race to zero fees points to a bigger war to come

NEW YORK/BOSTON (Reuters) - Fidelity Investments Inc and Charles Schwab Corp made moves in quick succession on Tuesday to slash trade commissions, accelerating the race to zero and foreshadowing a...

28 февраля, 02:10

Fidelity Investments to offer buyouts for older employees

BOSTON (Reuters) - Fidelity Investments plans to offer voluntary buyouts to employees who are 55 years or older, and who have worked for the Boston-based fund firm at least 10 years, a company...

28 февраля, 00:07

White House National Economic Council Director Announces Senior Staff Appointments

“We have assembled a best-in-class team of policy advisors to drive President Trump’s bold plan for job creation and economic growth,” Cohn said. “With their diverse backgrounds and deep knowledge of key policy issues, they will make significant contributions to the Nation.” Kenneth I. Juster will serve as Deputy Assistant to the President for International Economic Affairs and Deputy Director of the NEC. He is the President's representative and lead United States negotiator ("Sherpa") for the annual G-7, G-20, and APEC Summits. Juster previously served as Under Secretary of Commerce, Counselor (Acting) of the Department of State, and Deputy and Senior Advisor to the Deputy Secretary of State. In the private sector, Juster has been a Partner at the global investment firm Warburg Pincus, Executive Vice President of salesforce.com, and Senior Partner at the law firm Arnold & Porter. Juster is the recipient of the William C. Redfield Award from the Secretary of Commerce and the Distinguished Service Award from the Secretary of State. Juster holds a B.A. in government from Harvard College, an M.P.P. from Harvard’s Kennedy School, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. Jeremy Katz will serve as Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of the NEC. Katz was formerly a Managing Director and member of the Office of the Chairman at GCM Grosvenor, a global investment and advisory firm headquartered in Chicago. He previously served in the White House Chief of Staff's office as Special Assistant for Policy to President George W. Bush and Senior Policy Advisor to Commerce Secretary Donald Evans. Prior to his time in the United States Government, he worked at William Blair & Company. Katz holds a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. George David Banks will serve as Special Assistant to the President for International Energy and Environment. Banks was previously Executive Vice President of the American Council for Capital Formation, a business association based in Washington, D.C. Banks also served as GOP Deputy Staff Director of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and Senior Adviser on International Climate at the Council on Environmental Quality under President George W. Bush. He also worked as a diplomat for the U.S. State Department and analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency. Banks holds a B.A. in economics, history, and political science and an M.A. in economics from the University of Missouri, as well as a J.D. from George Mason University. Brian Blase will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Healthcare Policy. Blase was previously a senior research fellow with the Spending and Budget Initiative at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. During that period, he researched the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Medicaid, writing regular studies and commentaries. From 2011 through 2015, Blase worked as a senior health care staffer on Capitol Hill for both the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Senate Republican Policy Committee. Blase received his Ph.D. in economics from George Mason University in 2013, with a dissertation on the Medicaid program. Blase holds a B.S. in mathematics and B.A. in political science from Pennsylvania State University. Michael Catanzaro will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Domestic Energy and Environmental Policy. Catanzaro served on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and on the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign as a top staffer on energy and environmental policy. He was Associate Director for Policy in the White House Council on Environmental Quality and Associate Deputy Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. He also worked for then-Speaker John Boehner as senior adviser on energy and environmental policy. He was most recently a partner at the CGCN Group in Washington, D.C. He holds a B.A. in political science and philosophy from Fordham University and an M.A. in government from Johns Hopkins University. DJ Gribbin will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Infrastructure Policy. Gribbin previously headed government advisory for Macquarie Capital, a role in which he led advisory teams structuring public-private partnership transactions for governmental clients. He has also worked for Koch Industries and HDR helping clients develop innovative ways to deliver infrastructure. Gribbin has served as the Chief Counsel for the Federal Highway Administration and the General Counsel for the U.S. Department of Transportation. He holds a B.A. and J.D. from Georgetown University and is a member of the Virginia Bar and licensed broker dealer, holding Series 7, 24, and 63 licenses. Mathew Haarsager will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Global Economics and Finance. Haarsager has worked at the U.S. Department of Treasury since 1998, serving as Director of the Office of International Monetary Policy, Acting U.S. Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund, U.S. Treasury Representative for Europe, Director of the Office of East Asia, U.S. Treasury Representative for South America, U.S. Treasury Representative for Mexico and Deputy Director of the Office of Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia. He previously worked in international capital markets in New York, Frankfurt and Zurich. Haarsager holds a B.A. from Occidental College, an M.S. from the London School of Economics and an M.P.P. from Harvard University. Shahira Knight will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Tax and Retirement Policy. Knight was previously Vice President in the Public Affairs and Policy Group at Fidelity Investments. Knight formerly served on the Ways and Means Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives. In her last role at the committee, she was the Senior Advisor to the Chairman, where she led the Committee’s legislative and policy operations. Knight also worked at the Joint Economic Committee, where she was responsible for writing policy papers on various tax and budget issues. Her research has been cited in a wide range of publications. Knight holds a B.A. in economics from the University of Virginia and an M.A. in economics from George Mason University.    Grace Koh will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Technology, Telecom, and Cyber-Security Policy. Koh previously served as Deputy Chief Counsel to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology of the Energy and Commerce Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives. Her primary role was to advise the chairmen and committee members on policy and legal issues arising in the telecommunications and technology sectors. She was previously Policy Counsel at Cox Enterprises, Inc.'s Public Policy Office, working on technology policies affecting the enterprise's Internet, cable, and broadcast properties. Koh came to Cox Enterprises after working in the communications group at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP. She holds a B.A. from Yale University and a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Ashley Hickey Marquis will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and Chief of Staff. Marquis was previously Vice President for Strategic Communications at the Glover Park Group, where she executed complex integrated communications campaigns and reputation management for leading national and global corporations across a range of industries. She was formerly Policy Director and Chief of Staff at (RED), a division of the campaigning and advocacy organization, ONE. Marquis served in Oval Office Operations at the White House under President George W. Bush and as Special Assistant to President Bush during his post-presidency. She holds a B.A. in government from Georgetown University and an M.S. from Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism. Andrew Olmem will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Financial Policy. Olmem was previously a partner at Venable, LLP in Washington, D.C. He served as the Republican Chief Counsel and Deputy Staff Director at the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs and was on the staff of the Committee from 2005 until 2013. Olmem began his legal career practicing corporate and securities law at Mayer Brown. Prior to attending law school, he served as an Assistant Economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. He holds a B.A. in economics from Washington and Lee University and a J.D. from the Washington and Lee University School of Law. He is the past Chair of the Subcommittee on Legislation and Regulation of the American Bar Association’s Banking Law Committee. Andrew Quinn will serve as Special Assistant to the President for International Trade, Investment and Development. Quinn previously worked at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, where he served as Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative and worked on a number of trade negotiations and agreements, principally with countries in Asia and the Western Hemisphere. He also served on the National Security Council as Director for Asian Economic Affairs. Quinn worked at the State Department as a member of the Senior Foreign Service, serving at a number of United States embassies abroad, and also served as a Legislative Assistant for Trade and Foreign Affairs at the U.S. Senate. He holds a B.A. from Dartmouth College. Ray Starling will serve as Special Assistant to the President for Agriculture, Trade and Food Assistance. Starling was previously Chief of Staff for U.S. Senator Thom Tillis. He also served as Senator Tillis’ Chief Counsel and then-Speaker Tillis’ General Counsel and Senior Agriculture Advisor in the N.C. General Assembly. He has been the General Counsel for the N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, has private practice experience from several years at Hunton & Williams and has taught numerous agricultural and food law courses. After growing up on a Century Family Farm in southeast North Carolina, Ray received a B.S. in Agricultural Education from N.C. State University and a J.D. from UNC-Chapel Hill.  

15 января, 17:43

Retirees, It May Be Time To Get Your Head Out Of The Sand

Let's face it; aging is tough. Who said it was graceful? Unfortunately, a new study by Fidelity Investments indicates that seniors are having a tough time managing their finances as they age. Luckily, there is something that you can do today! Take the necessary steps to start planning now.

13 мая 2015, 04:23

По конспироложествуем об очередных кандидатах в члены мирового правительства?

Банки правят миром. А кто правит банками? Сегодня уже не надо доказывать, что пресловутая гегемония США зиждется на монополии печатного станка Федеральной резервной системы (ФРС). Более или менее понятно также, что акционерами ФРС выступают банки мирового калибра. В их число входят не только банки США (банки Уолл-стрит), но и европейские банки Европы (банки Лондонского Сити и некоторых стран континентальной Европы). В период мирового финансового кризиса 2007-2009 гг. ФРС, действуя без огласки, раздала разным банкам кредитов (почти беспроцентных) на сумму свыше 16 трлн. долл. Хозяева денег раздавали кредиты самим себе, то есть тем банкам, которые и являются главными акционерами Федерального резерва. В начале текущего десятилетия под сильным нажимом Конгресса США был проведен частичный аудит ФРС, и летом 2011 года его результаты были обнародованы. Список получателей кредитов и есть список главных акционеров ФРС. Вот они (в скобках указаны суммы полученных кредитов ФРС в миллиардах долларов): Citigroup (2500); Morgan Staley (2004); Merril Lynch (1949); Bank of America (1344); Barclays PLC (868); Bear Sterns (853); Goldman Sachs (814); Royal Bank of Scotland (541); JP Morgan (391); Deutsche Bank (354); Credit Swiss (262); UBS (287); Leman Brothers (183); Bank of Scotland (181); BNP Paribas (175). Примечательно, что целый ряд получателей кредитов ФРС - не американские, а иностранные банки: английские (Barclays PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland, Bank of Scotland); швейцарские (Credit Swiss, UBS); немецкий Deutsche Bank; французский BNP Paribas. Указанные банки получили от Федерального резерва около 2,5 триллиона долларов. Не ошибёмся, если предположим, что это – иностранные акционеры ФРС. Однако если состав главных акционеров Федрезерва более или менее понятен, то этого не скажешь в отношении акционеров тех банков, которые, собственно, и владеют печатным станком ФРС. Кто же является акционерами акционеров Федерального резерва? Прежде всего, рассмотрим ведущие банки США. На сегодняшний день ядро банковской системы США представлено шестью банками. «Большая шестерка» включает Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Citigroup. Они занимают первые строчки американских банковских рейтингов по таким показателям, как величина капитала, контролируемых активов, привлеченных депозитов, капитализация, прибыль. Если ранжировать банки по показателю активов, то на первом месте оказывается JP Morgan Chase (2.075 млрд. долл. в конце 2014 г.). По показателю капитализации первое место занимает Wells Fargo (261,7 млрд. долл. осенью 2014 года). Кстати, по этому показателю Wells Fargo вышел на первое место не только в Америке, но и в мире (хотя по активам в США он занимает лишь четвертое место, а в мире даже не входит в первую двадцатку). На официальных сайтах этих банков имеется кое-какая информация об акционерах. Основная часть капитала «большой шёстерки» американских банков находится в руках так называемых институциональных акционеров – разного рода финансовых компаний. Среди них есть и банки, то есть имеет место перекрестное участие в капитале. Количество институциональных инвесторов на начало 2015 года в отдельных банках было следующим: Bank of America – 1410; JP Morgan Chase – 1795; Morgan Stanley – 826; Goldman Sachs – 1018; Wells Fargo – 1729; Citigroup – 1247. В каждом из названных банков достаточно четко выделяется группа крупных инвесторов (акционеров). Это те инвесторы (акционеры), которые имеют более 1 процента капитала каждый. Таких акционеров насчитывается, как правило, от 10 до 20. Бросается в глаза, что во всех банках в группе крупных инвесторов фигурируют одни и те же компании и организации. В табл. 1 приведем список таких крупнейших институциональных инвесторов (акционеров). Табл. 1. Источник: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=GS+Major+Holders   Кроме обозначенных в таблице институциональных инвесторов в списках акционеров ведущих американских банков присутствуют следующие организации: Capital World Investors, Massachusetts Financial Services, Price (T. Rowe) Associates Inc., Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Dodge & Cox Inc., Invesco Ltd., Franklin Resources, Inc., Bank of New York Mellon Corporation и некоторые другие. Я называю лишь те, которые фигурируют в качестве акционеров хотя бы в двух из шести ведущих банков США. Фигурирующие в финансовой отчетности ведущих американских банков институциональные акционеры – это различные финансовые компании и банки. Отдельный учет ведется в отношении таких акционеров, как физические лица и взаимные фонды. В целом ряде банков Уолл-стрит заметная доля акций принадлежит работникам этих банков. Разумеется, это не рядовые сотрудники, а ведущие менеджеры (впрочем, некоторое символическое количество акций могут иметь и рядовые банковские служащие). Что касается взаимных фондов (mutual funds) (1), то многие из них находятся в сфере влияния все тех же институциональных акционеров, которые названы выше. В качестве примера можно привести список наиболее крупных акционеров американского банка Goldman Sachs, относящихся к категории взаимных фондов (табл. 2). Табл. 2. Источник: finance.yahoo.com По крайней мере три фонда из приведенных в таблице 2 находятся в сфере влияния финансовой корпорации Vanguard Group. Это Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund, Vanguard 500 Index Fund, Vanguard Institutional Index Fund-Institutional Index Fund. Доля Vanguard Group в акционерном капитале Goldman Sachs – 4,90%. А три взаимных фонда, находящихся в системе этого финансового холдинга, дают дополнительно еще 3,59%. Таким образом, фактически позиции Vanguard Group в банке Goldman Sachs определяются долей не 4,90%, а 8,49%. В ряде банков Уолл-стрит имеется категория индивидуальных акционеров – физических лиц. Как правило, это высшие руководители данного банка, как действующие, так и ушедшие на пенсию. Приведем справку об индивидуальных акционерах банка Goldman Sachs (табл. 3). Табл. 3. Источник: finance.yahoo.com В совокупности указанные в табл. 3 пять физических лиц имеют на руках более 5,5 млн. акций банка Goldman Sachs, что составляет примерно 1,3% всего акционерного капитала банка. Это столько же, сколько акций у такого институционального акционера, как Northern Trust. Кто эти люди? Высшие менеджеры Goldman Sachs. Ллойд Бланкфейн, например, - председатель совета директоров и главный исполнительный директор Goldman Sachs с 31 мая 2006 года. Джон Вайнберг – вице-президент Goldman Sachs с того же времени, одновременно член управляющего комитета и сопредседатель подразделения инвестиционного банкинга (последний пост он оставил в декабре 2014 года). Три других индивидуальных акционера также относятся к категории высшего менеджмента банка Goldman Sachs, причем все являются действующими сотрудниками данного банка. Достаточно ли нескольких процентов участия в акционерном капитале для того, чтобы эффективно управлять банком? Тут следует учесть, по крайней мере, три момента. Во-первых, в ведущих банках США давно уже нет очень крупных акционеров. Формально в этих банках нет ни одного акционера, доля которого была бы выше 10%. Общее число институциональных акционеров (инвесторов) в американских банках колеблется в пределах одной тысячи. Получается, что в среднем на одного институционального акционера приходится примерно 0,1 процента капитала. На самом деле - меньше, поскольку кроме них есть еще взаимные фонды (учитываемые отдельно), а также многие тысячи физических лиц. В ряде банков акциями владеют служащие. В случае банка Goldman Sachs в руках физических лиц находится около 7% акционерного капитала. Наконец, часть акций находятся в свободном обращении на фондовом рынке. С учетом распыления акционерного капитала среди десятков тысяч держателей бумаг владение даже 1 процентом акций банка Уолл-стрит – это очень мощная позиция. Во-вторых, за несколькими (или многими) формально самостоятельными акционерами может стоять один и тот же хозяин - конечный бенефициар. Скажем, хозяева финансового холдинга Vanguard Group участвуют в капитале банка Goldman Sachs и напрямую, и через взаимные фонды, находящиеся в сфере влияния указанного холдинга. Скорее всего, доля Vanguard Group в капитале Goldman Sachs не 4,90% (доля материнской компании) и не 8,49% (доля с учетом трех подконтрольных взаимных фондов), а больше. Нельзя сбрасывать со счетов и акционеров – физических лиц, чей удельный вес намного выше, чем их доля в акционерном капитале, поскольку это высшие менеджеры, поставленные на руководящие должности теми, кого называют «конечными бенефициарами». В-третьих, есть такие акционеры, влияние которых на политику банка превышает их долю в акционерном капитале по той причине, что они владеют так называемыми голосующими акциями. В то же время другие акционеры владеют так называемыми привилегированными акциями. Последние дают их владельцам такую привилегию, как получение фиксированного дивиденда, но при этом лишают их владельца права голосования на собраниях акционеров. Скажем, акционер может иметь долю в капитале банка, равную 5%, но при этом его доля в общем количестве голосов может быть 10, 20 или даже 50%. А привилегия решающего голоса для банков Уолл-стрит может иметь гораздо большее значение, чем привилегия получения гарантированного дохода. Вернемся к табл. 1 в первой части статьи. Она показывает, что почти во всех американских банках главными акционерами являются финансовые холдинги. При этом если названия ведущих банков Уолл-стрит сегодня известны всем, то названия финансовых холдингов, владеющих большими пакетами акций этих банков, говорят о чем-то лишь очень узкому кругу финансистов. А ведь речь идет о тех, кто в конечном счете контролирует банковскую систему США и Федеральную резервную систему. Например, в последнее время довольно часто упоминался инвестиционный фонд Franklin Templeton Investments, который скупил долговые бумаги Украины на 7-8 млрд. долл. и активно участвует в экономическом удушении этой стран. Между тем указанный фонд – дочерняя структура финансового холдинга Franklin Resources Inc., который является акционером банка Citigroup (доля 1,24%) и банка Morgan Stanley (1,40%). Такие финансовые холдинги, как Vanguard Group, State Street Corporation, FMR (Fidelity), Black Rock, Northern Trust, Capital World Investors, Massachusetts Financial Services, Price (T. Rowe) Associates Inc., Dodge & Cox Inc.; Invesco Ltd., Franklin Resources, Inc., АХА, Capital Group Companies, Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO) и еще несколько других не просто участвуют в капитале американских банков, а владеют преимущественно голосующими акциями. Именно эти финансовые компании и осуществляют реальный контроль над банковской системой США. Некоторые аналитики полагают, что акционерное ядро банков Уолл-стрит составляют всего четыре финансовые компании. Другие компании-акционеры либо не относятся к категории ключевых акционеров, либо прямо или через цепочку посредников контролируются все той же «большой четвёркой». В табл. 4 представлена сводная информация о главных акционерах ведущих банков США. Табл. 4. Оценки величины активов, находящихся в управлении финансовых компаний, являющихся акционерами главных банков США, достаточно условны и периодически пересматриваются. В некоторых случаях оценки включают лишь собственные активы компаний, в других случаях – ещё и активы, передаваемые компаниям в трастовое управление. В любом случае величина контролируемых ими активов впечатляет. Осенью 2013 года в списке мировых банков, ранжированных по величине активов, на первом месте находился китайский банк Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) с активами 3,1 трлн. долл. Максимальные активы в банковской системе США на тот момент имел банк Bank of America (2,1 трлн. долл.). За ним следовали такие американские банки, как Citigroup (1,9 трлн. долл.) и Wells Fargo (1,5 трлн. долл.). Примечательно, что триллионными активами финансовые холдинги «большой четвёрки» ворочают при использовании достаточно скромного числа сотрудников. При совокупных активах, равных примерно 15 трлн. долл., персонал «большой четвёрки» не дотягивает до 100 тыс. человек. Для сравнения: численность сотрудников лишь в банке Citigroup составляет около 250 тыс. человек, в Wells Fargo – 280 тыс. человек. В сравнении с финансовыми холдингами «большой четвёрки» банки Уолл-стрит выглядят рабочими лошадками. По показателю контролируемых активов финансовые компании «большой четвёрки» находятся в более тяжелой весовой категории, чем американские банки «большой шестёрки». «Большая четвёрка» финансовых холдингов простирает свои щупальца не только на банковскую систему США, но и на компании других секторов американской и зарубежной экономики. Тут можно вспомнить исследование специалистов Швейцарского технологического института (Цюрих), целью которого было выявить управляющее ядро мировой экономической и финансовой системы. В 2011 году швейцарцы причислили к ядру мировых финансов 1218 компаний и банков по состоянию на начало финансового кризиса (2007 год). Внутри этого конгломерата было выявлено еще более плотное ядро из 147 компаний. По оценкам авторов исследования, это малое ядро контролировало 40% всех корпоративных активов в мире. Компании ядра были швейцарскими исследователями ранжированы. Воспроизведем первую десятку этого рейтинга: 1. Barclays plc 2. Capital Group Companies Inc 3. FMR Corporation 4. AXA 5. State Street Corporation 6. JP Morgan Chase & Co 7. Legal & General Group plc 8. Vanguard Group Inc 9. UBS AG 10. Merrill Lynch & Co Inc. Важное обстоятельство: все 10 строчек швейцарского списка занимают организации финансового сектора. Из них четыре – банки, названия которых у всех на слуху (одного из них – Merrill Lynch – уже не существует). Особо отметим американский банк JP Morgan Chase & Co. Это не просто банк, а банковский холдинг, участвующий в капиталах многих других американских банков. Как видно из табл. 1, JP Morgan Chase участвует в капитале всех других банков «большой шестёрки» за исключением банка Goldman Sachs. В банковском мире США есть еще один примечательный банк, который формально не входит в «большую шестёрку», но который невидимо контролирует некоторые из банков «большой шестёрки». Речь идет о банке The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Указанный банк являлся держателем акций в Citigroup (доля 1,24%), JP Morgan Chase (1,48%), Bank of America (1,25%). А вот шесть строчек швейцарского списка принадлежат финансовых компаниям, редко фигурирующим в открытой печати. Это финансовые холдинги, которые специализируются на приобретении по всему миру пакетов акций компаний разных отраслей экономики. Многие из них учреждают различные инвестиционные, в том числе взаимные, фонды, осуществляют управление активами клиентов на основе договоров траста и т.д. В этом списке мы видим три финансовые компании из «большой четвёрки», отображенной в табл. 4: Vanguard Group Inc, FMR Corporation (Fidelity) и State Street Corporation. Эти финансовые холдинги, а также компания Black Rock (сильно укрепившая свои позиции с 2007 года) и образуют ядро банковской системы США. Примечательно, что «большая четвёрка» очень хорошо представлена и в банковском холдинге JP Morgan Chase: Vanguard Group – 5,46%; State Street Corporation – 4,71%; FMR Corporation (Fidelity) – 3,48%; Black Rock – 2,75%. Другой из названных выше банковских холдингов – The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation – контролируется тремя финансовыми компаниями «большой четвёрки»: Vanguard Group – 5,15%; State Street Corporation – 4,72%; FMR Corporation (Fidelity) Black Rock – 2,62%. После того как мы выявили управляющее ядро банковской системы США, состоящее из небольшого количества финансовых холдингов, возникает ряд новых вопросов. Кто является владельцами и конечными бенефициарами этих финансовых холдингов? Как далеко распространяется влияние этих финансовых холдингов в отраслевом и географическом отношениях? Можно ли утверждать, что подход к объяснению происходящего в сфере мировых финансов на основе концепции «борьбы кланов Ротшильдов и Рокфеллеров» устарел? Однако это уже тема другого разговора. (1) Взаимный фонд (ВФ), или фонд взаимных инвестиций  - это портфель акций, приобретённых профессиональными финансистами на вложения многих тысяч мелких вкладчиков. К началу XXI века в США действовало несколько тысяч взаимных фонов. К 2000 году в рамках взаимных фондов было открыто 164, 1 млн. счетов, то есть около двух на семью.