LafargeHolcim said on Tuesday that French police had searched its Paris offices as part of an ongoing inquiry into the construction company's Syrian business. "LafargeHolcim confirms that the French police visited our premises in Paris. LafargeHolcim is fully cooperating with the authorities, but cannot comment further as this is an ongoing investigation," said a company spokeswoman.
Как сообщала в 2016 году газета Le Monde, компания, владеющая цементным заводом в 150 км от Алеппо, вступила в контакт с боевиками террористической организации в 2013-2014 годах
MainStay Epoch International Choice R2 Fund (ICEYX) seeks strong return
En Syrie, Lafarge a vers des centaines de milliers d'euros aux terroristesLe groupe a accept� de verser une ran�on entre 2011 et 2014 � l'EI pour maintenir l'activit� et la s�curit� de son usine, selon les informations du Monde. Posted by Oleg Nasobin on 13 окт 2017, 08:28
The Financial Times has an excellent interview with economist Ricardo Hausmann on the Chavez and Maduro-created tragedy that is Venezuela. HT2 Timothy Taylor, aka, the Conversable Economist. The whole thing is worth reading. With help from a good interviewer, Cardiff Garcia, Hausmann, an economics professor at Harvard's Kennedy School, gives a good narrative about the changes in economic policy that took Venezuela from being one of the economic jewels of South America to being arguably, if the numbers are adjusted for reality, one of the poorest countries in South America. Short summary of economic policy: price controls, profligate government spending, and expropriations with the attendant disrespect for property rights. Short summary of political strategy: Chavez overthrows Venezuela's constraints on presidential power and he and his successor jail political opponents and critics. Now some highlights. The trouble started way before Chavez So it was a magnet. It was wealthy, prosperous. It used massively its resources to invest in infrastructure. When democracy came along it prioritised education, health, public housing. And it was a fairly prosperous place. University education was free. Not only primary and secondary but university education was free. There was very cheap access to electricity, water and so on. So it was a fairly prosperous place. When in 1973, 74 the price of oil went up, then the country had these grandiose plans. Very much State centric at the time. State owned enterprises in steel, aluminium, ship-building and all sorts of other things that ended up in very bad failures, and the 1980s was a very, very difficult period in Venezuela. Chavez's consolidation of power Well, in the first couple of years he was focused on changing the constitution in order to create a much more powerful Presidency, with a much longer period and with a possibility of re-election, with a single chamber in the legislative branch instead of two, so as to make it more pliant. And with the ability to scrap all the judicial system and start from scratch. So he concentrated his first couple of years in consolidating political power. He did not change the economics much. He left the same Finance Minister that [previous President Rafael] Caldera had, Maritza Izaguirre, and there was no discernible change in policies. Then in the year 2000, with the new constitution, he got re-elected and there he started to move a little bit more on the economic front, and in one day he asked the more-pliant-now National Assembly to grant him the power to pass laws through Presidential Decree. And on one day he passed 48 laws through a Decree. No-one had read the laws. Nobody had discussed the laws. That led to a massive protest movement, and that massive protest movement ended up unseating him for something like 48 hours, and then his popularity had actually collapsed and things were not looking well for him. Government spending on "social" programs and their intellectual origin And there he [Chavez] started to use oil money to massively expand social programmes. These social programmes were mostly designed by Cuba, in Cuba, with significant Cuban advice. And he started to spend a lot of the increasing oil money in that. Price controls, exchange controls, and import controls--and Chavez's motive So they used exchange controls, price controls, import controls as a way of keeping control on the private sector -- as a way of making the private sector pliant and dependent on bureaucratic decisions of the State. And there I think Sebastian Edwards' model of saying: Okay, what we are going to do now is we are going to expand spending, this is not going to generate inflation because we're going to have price controls, and this is not going to generate a balance of payments crisis because we have import controls... But that, mixed with the fact that they could borrow internationally, and they borrowed internationally in massive amounts. In incredibly massive amounts. The collapse of the oil industry that reads like a precis of a chapter in Atlas Shrugged Let me just give you a sense of the magnitude of the mismanagement of the oil industry. In 1998, the year before Chávez got elected, or the year in which in December of that year Chávez got elected and he took power in February 1999. In 1998, Venezuela produced 3.7 million barrels of oil [per day]. Today it's producing about two. If Venezuela had maintained its market share in the world oil industry -- which it could have because it had infinite reserves, it had the largest reserves in the world -- it would be producing two million barrels more than it is currently producing. With the same market share. So the collapse is immense relative to history, and it's immense relative to this opportunity cost of where it should have gone had it just kept its market share the way it was. That collapse of the oil industry happened in two steps. First, all the know-how of that industry, centuries of man-years of experience was lost in the firing of these people. They were not only fired but persecuted, so most of them left the country. Many of them left the country. And they caused, for example, an oil boom in Colombia [where many of them moved to]. Colombia went from producing 200,000 barrels of oil [per day] to a million barrels of oil thanks to the fact that Venezuelans knew how to extract much more oil from the fields that Colombia was already exploiting. So there was a massive loss of human capital. They also wanted to create a politically conscious oil company, so they started to put an enormous amount of social programmes and other things on the books of PDVSA, the oil company. And as a consequence they starved the company from investment and they ran the company in an amazingly corrupt way, and this is really not just talk about corruption but evidence of corruption in massive ways. There were these foreign oil companies... These foreign oil companies have been complaining to the government that they want to wrest control of the procurement of oil projects because they know that this procurement is being done at multiples of what things should cost. There's people that have been found in the US owning hundreds of millions of Dollars of money that has been laundered out of PDVSA and so on. Chavez's wave of nationalizations Exchange controls and price controls were put in 2004. Chávez won re-election in 2006. And in early 2007 he announced that he was now going to move towards socialism, and he started with a spree of nationalisations. In those days the price of oil was very high, so he could afford to just buy everything that moved or that he fancied. So for example he nationalised the telephone company that was owned by Verizon. He nationalised the three cement companies that were owned by the Mexicans, Cemex, Holcim and Lafarge. He nationalised one of the largest banks, which was owned at the time by Banco Santander. He nationalised the supermarket chain. He nationalised 3.7 million hectares of land. So he went on an expropriation spree. At the beginning, when he had money, he would pay for things, and then if these were things owned by people he didn't like, he would just expropriate and not pay for them. So he changed the contracts of the oil companies in a way that essentially extracted part of the expected cash flows out of them, and many of them accepted but a few of them, Exxon, Conoco Phillips and so on sued. And these suits are now being adjudicated by the International Court for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, and these investment disputes in Washington now add up to $16 billion of claims. Of expropriations that he didn't pay for. And these are only the foreigners. He expropriated the service companies that provided services to the oil company, because they started to protest that they were not being paid so instead of paying he just expropriated them. Another chapter out of Atlas Shrugged So he took over significant chunks of the Venezuelan economy, and the typical thing is that the moment they took over a company, they ran it to the ground. Production collapsed. They nationalised the steel company. The steel company at the time of nationalisation was producing 4.5 million tons of steel with 5,000 workers. It now has 22,000 workers but it's producing something like 200,000 tons of steel. So they ran those companies to the ground. Aluminium is almost not done any more, when Venezuela was producing about a million tons of aluminium back when... So essentially they expropriated the economy and collapsed it on the public sector. And in the private sector they created all these constraints and this enormous uncertainty over property rights because everybody else was being expropriated and you never knew when it would be your turn. Owens-Illinois was a company making bottles. They were expropriated. Why bottles? Another company making detergents was expropriated. Why detergents? So everybody else would not know when would his turn come up. The effect of the Venezuelan government's interventions on living standards So as a consequence, incomes per capita have collapsed to a degree that it is hard to transmit and understand, and that collapse in private incomes is accompanied by a collapse in public services like healthcare for example. They are just beyond belief. People have been writing pieces that I'm sure are going to win a Pulitzer Prize, because it's just astonishing how life expectancy rates, how the prevalence of diseases that had been eradicated... Venezuela was the first country to eradicate malaria back in 1961. Even before the US did. And malaria is back big time. Measles is back big time. There are no drugs for HIV. There are no drugs for hypertension. There are no machines to do dialysis. There are no cancer drugs. So there's been an incredible collapse in health standards. And as you know, Caracas is the highest murder city of the world. It beats Central American countries which come second and third as the most violent city in the world. So that is what's happened to the collapse in living standards. The awful role of lenders, including Goldman Sachs So you think of capital markets as being angels for good in the world. But when capital markets have to deal with a government that is willing to compromise future cash flows for any cash up front, and it's not using the resources to create any good things for the future, then you're giving money to an authoritarian regime to mismanage in the short run and you are condemning the future of the country with obligations that they will not be able to afford to pay. So that's why I call them hunger bonds. A very clear example that prompted this was Goldman Sachs lending the government $850 million at an interest rate of 50%. No-one has a project that pays 50%. So the government has $850 million now, then they have to pay an amount going forward that they will not have the resources to pay it with. Because they're not using the money in any investment programme that will be able to pay for that debt. That debt is just to prop up the current regime, and in my mind that makes that debt odious. It's a debt of the regime, it's not a debt that should bind the people of a country, because the regime does not represent the people and the regime cannot commit the future of the country. The people's future. Trump's sanctions, surprise, surprise, haven't made things better Cardiff Garcia: Any potential restructuring now is further complicated by the US sanctions enacted since that initial interview was taped. The sanctions which have made it very hard, maybe impossible, for US investors to enter into any new exchange of bonds that would happen as part of a restructuring. The government's attacks on Hausmann and a close relative Then obviously the government has attacked me for writing op-eds, or they accuse me of these fancy conspiracy theories of all kinds. But the truth is they haven't been able to grab me but they have been able to put my brother-in-law in jail for being a journalist. So that in itself was also a very traumatic experience for the whole family. So I would say this repression, this oppression, this destruction of dreams has been a very disrupting element of my life these last few years. . . . No, he's under house arrest. After spending seven months in very, very inhumane conditions. My one little criticism is that it would have been nice for Cardiff to draw Hausmann out on something that virtually every economist knows, but some readers do not: there is no mystery in why shelves in supermarkets are empty: price controls cause shortages and extreme price controls cause extreme shortages. (11 COMMENTS)
Ранее рядом с подъездом и в самом подъезде жилого дома на юге Парижа были найдены баллоны с газом
Olsen says he was not involved in wrongdoing as he presents promising Q1 results
KEEPING cool in the heat of war is not easy. That might help explain why LafargeHolcim, a French-Swiss cement-maker, blundered so badly while running operations in Syria as fighting raged. On April 24th the firm said that its chief executive, Eric Olsen, will go, a casualty of a growing scandal over its activities in the country. The board of the world’s biggest cement producer stated only last month that Mr Olsen was not responsible for, nor aware of, wrongdoing by the firm in Syria. But public pressure has been increasing, notably after Jean-Luc Mélenchon, a left-wing candidate in France’s presidential election, attacked the firm and its “damned cement” in a television debate on April 4th. François Fillon, a pro-business rival, agreed the firm should be punished if allegations against it proved to be true. At issue is the activity of Lafarge before the firm’s merger with its Swiss rival, Holcim, in 2015. In 2010 Lafarge had built a cement factory of 240 workers for $680m near Kobane, a north Syrian town. Operations there continued until 2014, long after the violence began in 2011. The firm evacuated foreigners in 2012; local workers fled in September...
Эрик Олсен, генеральный директор франко-швейцарского концерна LafargeHolcim, крупнейшего производителя цемента и других стройматериалов, объявил о досрочной отставке после признания концерном обвинений в финансировании террористических группировок в Сирии.
Eric Olsen, the cement maker’s chief executive, is stepping down after an internal inquiry found staff members paid off armed groups in Syria to allow safe passage for employees.
LafargeHolcim признала, что в 2013 году были приняты «неприемлемые» меры для продолжения работы завода в Джалабии
About a year ago, a French foreign minister tipped off authorities about Swiss-French cement giant, Holcim-Lafarge, in regards to their activities in Syria. It was alleged, and then proven, that managers in their Syrian plant were 'paying off' terror groups in order to stay in business, continuing to supply groups in Syria with the much needed concrete that was being used to rebuild after the destruction of war demanded it. Human rights groups, led by Sherpa and 11 former employees of Lafarge in Syria, filed suit to hold the world's largest producer of concrete accountable. “It appears from the investigation that the local company provided funds to third parties to work out arrangements with a number of these armed groups, including sanctioned parties, in order to maintain operations and ensure safe passage of employees and supplies to and from the plant. In hindsight, the measures required to continue operations at the plant were unacceptable...the investigation revealed significant errors of judgment that are inconsistent with the applicable code of conduct.” The CEO of Holcim, Eric Olsen, announced he'd be stepping down today, not because he did anything wrong, but to bring 'serenity' to the wholesome Swiss-French company. In a statement, Mr. Olsen said he was "driven by my conviction that it will contribute to addressing strong tensions that have recently arisen around the Syria case". "While I was absolutely not involved in, nor even aware of, any wrongdoing I believe my departure will contribute to bringing back serenity to a company that has been exposed for months on this case," he added. The Syrian factory in question was started in 2010, costing $680m. It stopped operating in 2014, after work in the region became untenable, due to the war. In Holcim's internal report on the matter, they said "very simply, chaos reigned and it was the task of local management to ensure that the intermediaries did whatever was necessary to secure its supply chain and the free movement of its employees." Holcim's stock peaked in June of 2014 at 78.9 chf, right around the time they closed down the Syrian plant. Shares are now trading in the mid 50s. Content originally published at iBankCoin.com
Правительственные войска Сирии заявили о ликвидации крупного «выступа» линии фронта на севере провинции Хама. Российская Федерация отправила 3,6 тонны гуманитарных грузов для жителей провинций Алеппо, Дамаск и Латакия.
Франко-швейцарская компания по производству стройматериалов LafargeHolcim скоро объявит об отставке генерального директора Эрика Олсена. Его уход станет последствием внутреннего расследования работы завода, которым компания управляла в Сирии до сентября 2014 года, сообщает Financial Times.По данным источников газеты, близких к компании, условия отставки все еще обсуждаются.Напомним, правозащитные организации утверждали, что LafargeHolcim помогала финансировать терроризм. В марте после завершения внутреннего расследования компания признала, что ее подразделение — цементный завод Lafarge Cement Syria в 2013–2014 годах — было вынуждено платить боевикам запрещенных террористических организаций, в том числе и ИГ, за доступ работников к предприятию. Компания указывала, что не смогла установить получателей денег от LafargeHolcim.
Мы начинаем публикацию серии статей по вопросам из недавно вышедшей книги Тьерри Мейсана «От 11 сентября до Дональда Трампа». Жан-Люк Меланшон во время предвыборных дебатов упомянул компанию Lafarge-Holcim, поэтому мы начнём с рассказа о том, чем на самом деле занималась эта компания в Сирии.
Lafarge является мировым лидером по производству цемента. По заказу НАТО в Сирии компания обеспечивает строительство бункеров для джихадистов, а в Ираке осуществляет восстановительные работы на суннитской территории. В ответ Lafarge передаёт Альянсу управление своими предприятиями, расположенными на территории этих стран.
Парижские прокуроры после жалобы министерства финансов Франции начали предварительное расследование относительно возможных финансовых операций между Lafarge и сирийскими группировками боевиков, находящимися под западными санкциями. Кроме того, правозащитная организация Sherpa подала против компании иск во Франции, обвинив ее в «деловых связях» с «Исламским государством» (ИГ, запрещено в России) и возможном финансировании террористической группировки. Правозащитники также считают, что компания могла ставить свои финансовые интересы выше интересов сотрудников завода в г. Джалабия на северо-востоке Сирии, которым грозили риски быть похищенными. «Это пример того, как материнская компания не выполнила свои обязанности по защите интересов» работников, говорит Мари-Лор Гюислэн, юрист Sherpa.
Сколько раз мы слышали эту фразу: «Это просто бизнес, ничего личного»? Но в наше время она обрела новый смысл. Ради сохранения прибыли дельцы готовы пойти на сделку с дьяволом и даже финансировать террористов, чем, собственно, и занималась франко-швейцарская компания LafargeHolcim Group в Сирии.