• Теги
    • избранные теги
    • Компании72
      • Показать ещё
      Страны / Регионы43
      • Показать ещё
      Люди3
      Разное12
      • Показать ещё
      Показатели5
      Международные организации4
      Издания3
      Формат1
National Bank of Abu Dhabi
12 августа, 19:00

Арабские страны Персидского Залива 2016

Ситуация в Саудовской Аравии продолжает развиваться весьма динамично. Основное внимание приковано к анонсированным сыном короля Салмана глобальным реформам, проводящимся в рамках проекта «Стратегия-2030». В связи с этим американский эксперт и журналист Д. Игнатиус высказал мнение, что посредством реформ королевский сын хочет превратить КСА во вторые ОАЭ. Именно поэтому Бин Салман тесно сблизился с наследным принцем […]

09 августа, 12:42

Обзор аравийских государств: кто будет защищать Мекку во время хаджа, зачем Эр-Рияду «троцкисты», и многое другое за июнь-июль 2016

Ситуация в Саудовской Аравии продолжает развиваться весьма динамично. Основное внимание приковано к анонсированным сыном короля Салмана глобальным реформам, проводящимся в рамках проекта "Стратегия-2030".

25 июля, 15:58

Как страны-экспортеры нефти преодолевают кризис

На первый взгляд решение Нигерии в прошлом месяце перейти на плавающий курс национальной валюты и объявление о слиянии двух банков в Объединенных Арабских Эмиратах (ОАЭ) на прошлой неделе имеют мало что общего.

25 июля, 15:58

Как страны-экспортеры нефти преодолевают кризис

На первый взгляд решение Нигерии в прошлом месяце перейти на плавающий курс национальной валюты и объявление о слиянии двух банков в Объединенных Арабских Эмиратах (ОАЭ) на прошлой неделе имеют мало что общего.

07 июля, 18:00

Banks in oil-exporting countries: Lending at $47 a barrel

Print section UK Only Article:  standard article Issue:  The Italian job Fly Title:  Banks in oil-exporting countries Main image:  Two is for joy Two is for joy AT FIRST glance, Nigeria’s decision last month to float its currency and the announcement this week of a bank merger in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have little in common. Nigeria is a country of almost 180m people with a GDP per person of less than $3,000 (at last year’s market exchange rates). The population of the UAE is 18 times smaller and 13 times better off. Both countries are, however, members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), a cartel, and both are learning to cope with cheaper crude. The merger of National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD) and First Gulf Bank (FGB), approved by their boards on July 3rd, will create a national champion with assets of over 640 billion dirhams ($175 billion). FGB’s strengths lie in consumer banking, credit cards and housing loans. NBAD describes itself as a “banker to the government”, with a strong investment-banking arm. The merged ...

05 июля, 12:01

В Абу-Даби создается крупнейший региональный банк

Советы директоров двух ведущих банков Абу-Даби (ОАЭ) National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD) и First Gulf Bank (FGB) согласовали сделку слияния, в результате которой образуется крупнейший по активам банк региона Ближнего Востока и Северной Африки.Активы нового банка составят $175 млрд. Согласно условиям сделки, это слияние равных, и акционеры FGB получат по 1,254 акции NBAD за каждую свою акцию. В результате 52% нового банка, который сохранит название NBAD, будут принадлежать акционерам FGB, а остальные 48% — акционерам прежнего NBAD.Рыночная капитализация объединенного банка достигнет $29 млрд, что больше чем у Standard Chartered или Deutsche Bank. Штаб-квартира нового банка разместится в Абу-Даби, а сеть его представительств охватит 19 стран мира. По словам экспертов, это крупнейшее банковское слияние в мире после финансового кризиса 2008 года, и оно может вызвать волну консолидации в банковском секторе…

03 июля, 20:16

FT сообщила о создании крупнейшего банка на Ближнем Востоке

Советы директоров банков Абу-Даби – National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD) и First Gulf Bank (FGB) – одобрили их слияние, сообщает в воскресенье, 3 июля, Financial Times. В результате будет создан крупнейший банк на Ближнем Востоке. Его капитализация составит $29 млрд, активы - $175 млрд.

03 июля, 11:02

Два крупнейших банка ОАЭ объединятся в структуру с объемом активов 175 млрд долларов

Два крупнейших банка Объединенных Арабских Эмиратов (ОАЭ) — First Gulf Bank (FGB) и National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD) — запустят процесс объединения бизнесов. В результате будет создан крупнейший банк на Ближнем Востоке и в Северной Африке с объемом активов приблизительно в 175 млрд долларов, сообщается в совместном пресс-релизе FGB и NBAD.

13 июня, 21:06

Chile’s ENAP Begins Exploration In Magallanes With ConocoPhillips

Empresa Nacional del Petroleo of Chile has signed a contract with ConocoPhillips (COP) to jointly explore and exploit oil and gas deposits in the Magallanes region, according to a source “familiar with the agreement” cited by Upstream. The state-run firm will retain a 51 percent stake in all fields found in the remote region, Reuters reported, based on an anonymous source. In total, Houston-based COP will invest between $70 and $100 million in Chile, depending on the success of the various stages of the process as they are carried out…

24 февраля, 01:02

Gulf States Not Willing To Cut Production Despite Asset Depletion

The oil exporting countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) are likely to report twin deficits due to the downturn in oil prices and a supply glut that could expand, but even as assets are being depleted at an alarming rate none is in enough trouble to cut production. According to the National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD)’s 2016 Global Investment Outlook, the region faces “significant asset depletion” as it will have to further adjust to low oil prices, which the report estimates will remain between $25 and $45 for the remainder…

02 сентября 2015, 00:29

Are “Palm Trees” The Next Step In Solar Energy’s Evolution?

Solar energy quickly gaining attention as the most attractive form of new electricity generation as there have been some substantial investments in the solar energy sector of late. In fact, more than 50 percent of the total investments in new electricity generation around the world was made in renewable energy. A report made by PWC and the University of Cambridge for the national bank of Abu Dhabi stated that the world invested around $150 billion into solar energy in 2014. “As Government and utilities are driven to bring new generation capacity…

16 апреля 2015, 18:07

The Renewable Revolution

Four Reasons Why the Transition From Fossil Fuels to a Green Energy Era Is Gaining Traction Cross-posted with TomDispatch.com Don’t hold your breath, but future historians may look back on 2015 as the year that the renewable energy ascendancy began, the moment when the world started to move decisively away from its reliance on fossil fuels. Those fuels -- oil, natural gas, and coal -- will, of course, continue to dominate the energy landscape for years to come, adding billions of tons of heat-trapping carbon to the atmosphere.  For the first time, however, it appears that a shift to renewable energy sources is gaining momentum.  If sustained, it will have momentous implications for the world economy -- as profound as the shift from wood to coal or coal to oil in previous centuries. Global economic growth has, of course, long been powered by an increasing supply of fossil fuels, especially petroleum. Beginning with the United States, countries that succeeded in mastering the extraction and utilization of oil gained immense economic and political power, while countries with huge reserves of oil to exploit and sell, like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, became fabulously wealthy.  The giant oil companies that engineered the rise of petroleum made legendary profits, accumulated vast wealth, and grew immensely powerful.  Not surprisingly, the oil states and those energy corporations continue to dream of a future in which they will play a dominant role.  “Fossil fuels are our most enduring energy source,” said Ali Al-Naimi, Saudi Arabia’s minister of petroleum and mineral resources, in April 2013.  “They are the driving force of economic development in the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and for much of the developed and developing world [and] they have the capacity to sustain us well into the future.” But new developments, including a surprising surge in wind and solar installations, suggest that oil’s dominance may not prove as “enduring” as imagined.  “Rapidly spreading solar technology could change everything,” energy analyst Nick Butler recently wrote in the Financial Times.  “There is growing evidence that some fundamental changes are coming that will over time put a question mark over investments in old energy systems.” Normally, transitions from one energy system to another take many decades.  According to Vaclav Smil of the University of Manitoba, the shift from wood to coal and coal to oil each took 50 years.  The same length of time, he has argued, will be needed to complete the transition to renewables, which would leave any green energy era in the distant future.  “The slow pace of this energy transition is not surprising,” he wrote in Scientific American.  “In fact, it is expected.” Smil’s analysis, however, assumes two things: first, that a business-as-usual environment in which decisions about energy investments will largely be made within the same profit-seeking outlook as in the past will continue to prevail; and second, that it will take decades for renewables to best fossil fuels in terms of cost and practicality.  Both assumptions, however, appear increasingly flawed.  Concern over climate change is already altering the political and regulatory landscape, while improvements in wind and solar technology are occurring at an extraordinary rate, rapidly eliminating the price advantage of fossil fuels.  “The direction of change is clear,” Butler writes.  With the cost of renewable installations falling, solar power has moved “from being a niche supplier to being a major regional competitor [to fossil fuels].” Experts largely agree that renewables will claim a larger share of the global energy budget in the years ahead.  Nevertheless, most mainstream analysts continue to believe that fossil fuels will be the dominant form of energy for decades to come.  The U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) typically predicts that the share of world energy provided by renewables, nuclear, and hydro combined will climb from 17 percent in 2015 to a mere 22 percent in 2040 -- hardly change on a scale that would threaten the predominance of fossil fuels. There are, however, four key trends that could speed the transition to renewables in striking ways: the world’s growing determination to put a brake on the advance of climate change; a sea change in China’s stance on growth and the environment; the increasing embrace of green energy in the developing world; and the growing affordability of renewable energy. Taking Climate Change Seriously Resistance to progress on climate change is widespread and well entrenched.  As Naomi Klein documents in her latest book, This Changes Everything, the major fossil fuel companies have mounted well-financed campaigns for years to sow doubt about the reality of climate change, while politicians, often in their pay, have obstructed efforts to place restraints on carbon emissions.  At the same time, many ordinary people have been reluctant to acknowledge what's happening and so to consider steps to bring it under control (a phenomenon examined by George Marshall in Don’t Even Think About It).  As the devastating effects of extreme weather, including droughts, floods, and ever more powerful storms, gain greater prominence in everyday life, however, all of this is clearly in flux. Considerable evidence can be assembled to support this assessment, including recent polling data, but perhaps the most impressive indication of this shift can be found in the carbon-reduction plans major nations are now submitting to U.N. authorities in preparation for a global climate summit to be held this December in Paris.  Under a measure adopted by delegates to the most recent summit, held last December in Lima, Peru, all parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are obliged to submit detailed action plans known as “intended nationally determined contributions” (INDCs) to the global climate effort.  These plans, for the most part, have proven to be impressively tough and ambitious.  More important yet, the numbers being offered when it comes to carbon reduction would have been inconceivable only a few years ago. The U.S. plan, for example, promises that national carbon emissions will drop 26 percent-28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025, which represents a substantial reduction.  There are, of course, many obstacles to achieving this goal, most notably the diehard resistance of Republican legislators with strong ties to the fossil fuel industry.  The White House insists, however, that many of the measures included in the INDC can be achieved through executive branch action, including curbs on carbon emissions from coal plants and mandated improvements in the fuel efficiency of cars and trucks. Other countries have submitted similarly ambitious INDCs.  Mexico, for example, has pledged to cap its carbon emissions by 2026, and to achieve a 22 percent reduction in greenhouse gas levels by 2030.  Its commitment is considered especially significant, since it’s the first such pledge by a major developing nation.  “Mexico is setting an example for the rest of the world by submitting an INDC that is timely, clear, ambitious, and supported by robust, unconditional policy commitments,” the Obama White House noted in a congratulatory statement. No one can predict the outcome of the December climate summit, but few observers expect the measures it may endorse to be tough enough to keep future increases in global temperatures below two degrees Celsius, the maximum amount most scientists believe the planet can absorb without incurring climate disasters far beyond anything seen to date.  Nevertheless, implementation of the INDCs, or even a significant portion of them, would at least produce a significant reduction in fossil fuel consumption and point the way to a different future. A Sea Change in Chinese Energy Behavior Of equal importance is China’s evident determination to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels -- a critical change in stance, given its projected energy needs in the decades to come. According to the DoE, China’s share of world energy consumption is expected to jump from an already impressive 19 percent in 2010 to 27 percent in 2040, with most of its added energy coming from fossil fuels. Should this indeed occur, China would consume another 88 quadrillion British thermal units of such energy over the next 30 years, or 43 percent of all added fossil fuel consumption worldwide. So any significant moves by China to reduce its reliance on those energy sources, as now being promised by senior government officials, would have an outsized impact on the global energy equation. China has not yet submitted its INDC, but its plan is expected to incorporate the commitments made by President Xi Jinping in a meeting with President Obama in Beijing last November.  Xi promised to cap China’s carbon emissions by 2030 and increase the share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to around 20 percent by that time.  He also agreed to work with the U.S. “to make sure international climate change negotiations will reach agreement as scheduled at the Paris conference in 2015.” Although the Chinese plan allows for continued growth in carbon emissions for another 15 years, it substantially reduces the amount of new energy that will be derived from fossil fuels.  According to a White House statement, “It will require China to deploy an additional 800-1,000 gigawatts of nuclear, wind, solar, and other zero-emission generation capacity by 2030 -- more than all the coal-fired power plants that exist in China today.” It appears, moreover, that Chinese leaders are preparing to move even faster than their pledge would require in transitioning away from fossil fuels.  Under pressure from urban residents to reduce punishing levels of smog, the authorities have announced ambitious plans to lessen reliance on coal for electricity generation and rely instead on hydropower, nuclear, wind, and solar power, as well as natural gas.  “We will strive for zero-growth in the consumption of coal in key areas of the country,” Premier Li Keqiang told the National People’s Congress, China’s legislature, this March. As in the United States, the Chinese leadership will face opposition from entrenched fossil fuel interests, as well as local government structures.  However, their evident determination to reduce reliance on oil and coal represents a real change of mood and thinking.  It’s likely to result in a far different energy landscape than the one laid out by the Department of Energy and, until recently, most other experts.  Despite repeated predictions of ever-increasing coal consumption, for instance, China actually burned less coal in 2014 than in the previous year, the first such decline in decades.  At the same time, it increased its spending on renewable forms of energy by an impressive 33 percent in 2014, investing a total of $83.3 billion -- the most ever spent by a single country in one year -- to a renewable future.  If China leads the way globally and such trends continue, the transition from fossil fuels to renewables will occur far sooner than expected. Green Goes Global The giant oil companies have long acknowledged that the most advanced countries, led by the U.S., Japan, and Europe, would eventually transition from fossil fuels to renewables, but they continue to insist that developing nations -- eager to expand their economies but too poor to invest in alternative energy -- will continue to rely on fossil fuels in a big way.  This outlook led ExxonMobil and other oil firms to make massive investments in new refineries, pipelines, and other infrastructure aimed at satisfying anticipated demand from the global South.  But surprise, surprise: those countries are also showing every sign of turning to renewables in their drive to expand energy output. The global South’s surprisingly enthusiastic embrace of renewables is impressively documented in Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2015, a recent collaboration between the Frankfurt School of Finance and Management and the U.N. Environment Programme.  It reports that the developing countries, excluding China, spent $30 billion on renewables in 2014, a substantial rise over the previous year. Together with China, investment in renewables in the developing world totaled nearly as much as that spent by the developed countries that year.  Significant increases in spending on renewables were registered by Brazil (for a total of $7.6 billion), India ($7.4 billion), and South Africa ($5.5 billion); investments of $1 billion or more were posted by Chile, Indonesia, Kenya, Mexico, and Turkey.  Given how little such countries were devoting to a renewable future just a few years ago, consider this a sign of changing times. No less striking is the degree to which oil-producing countries are beginning to embrace green energy.  In January, for example, the Dubai Electricity and Water Authority awarded a contract to Saudi Arabia’s ACWA Power International to build a 200-megawatt, $330 million solar electricity plant.  The deal received widespread attention, as ACWA promised to deliver electricity from the plant for $58.50 per megawatt-hour, one-third less than the cost of natural gas-fired generation. “This is a major breakthrough in the oil-fired Emirates and a clear demonstration of the ongoing global energy transition,” suggested Mark Lewis of Kepler Cheuvreux, a European financial services company.  “We think this is a landmark deal both in terms of the extremely competitive cost at which the project will generate power and the potential for a much greater take-up of renewables in countries that have so far been slow to embrace them.” The Falling Price of Renewables As the Dubai deal indicates, price is playing a crucial role in the shift from fossil fuels to renewables.  Listen to the apostles of coal and oil and you’d think that poor countries had no choice but to rely on their chosen form of energy because of its low cost compared to other fuels.  “There are still hundreds of millions, billions of people living in abject poverty around the world,” said Rex Tillerson, the CEO and Chairman of ExxonMobil.  “They need electricity they can count on, that they can afford... They'd love to burn fossil fuels because their quality of life would rise immeasurably, and their quality of health and the health of their children and their future would rise immeasurably.” Until recently, this would have been gospel among mainstream energy experts, but the cost of renewables, especially solar power, is dropping so rapidly that, even in a moment when the price of oil has been halved, the news on the horizon couldn’t be clearer: fossil fuels are no longer guaranteed a price advantage in delivering energy to developing countries.  Among the harbingers of this change: the cost of solar photovoltaic cells (PVs) has plunged by 75 percent since 2009 and the cost of electricity generated by solar PVs has fallen globally by 50 percent since 2010.  In other words, solar is now becoming competitive with oil and natural gas, even at their currently depressed prices.  “Cost is no longer a reason not to proceed with renewables,” concluded a report released by the National Bank of Abu Dhabi in March.  Says Lewis of Kepler Cheuvreux:  “Over time, as renewable-technology costs continue to come down and economies of scale continue to increase, the relative competitiveness of renewables in the global energy mix will only increase further.” Keep in mind as well that developing nations have a powerful reason to favor renewables over fossil energy that has nothing to do with price and everything to do with costs of another sort.  As the most recent reports from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) make clear, poor countries in the global South will suffer more (and sooner) from the ravages of climate change than countries in the global North.  This is so because these countries are expected to experience some of the sharpest declines in rainfall and so the most droughts, endangering the food supply for hundreds of millions of people.  Combine such concerns with the plunging prices of renewable energy, and it appears that the transition away from fossil fuels will occur faster than predicted in the very regions that the oil companies were counting on for their future profits. A New World’s A-Coming Add up these factors, all relatively unexpected, and one conclusion seems self-evident: we are witnessing the start of a global energy transition that could turn expectations upside down, politically, environmentally, and economically.  This transformation won’t happen overnight and it will face fierce opposition from powerful and entrenched fossil fuel interests.  Even so, it shows every sign of accelerating, which means that while we may be talking decades, the half-century horizon previously offered by experts like Vaclav Smil is probably no longer in the cards.  Fossil fuels -- and the companies, politicians, and petro-states they have long enriched -- will lose their dominant status and be overtaken by the purveyors of renewable energy far more quickly than that.  Even with the quickening of investment in green technology, the likelihood that world temperatures will be held at a 2 degrees Celsius rise, that all-important threshold for catastrophic damage, is unfortunately vanishingly small.  Which means that our children and grandchildren will live in a distinctly less inviting world.  But as the destructive effects of climate change become more pronounced and more embedded in daily life across the planet, the impetus to slow the warming phenomenon will only intensify.  This means that the urge to impose strict curbs on fossil fuel consumption and the companies that promote it will grow, too. We’re talking, in other words, about the building of genuine momentum for an energy transition which, in turn, means that the majority of people alive on the planet today will experience the ascendancy of renewables.  As with previous energy transitions, this shift is going to produce both winners and losers.  Countries and companies that assume early leadership in the development and installation of advanced green technologies are likely to prosper in the years ahead, while those committed to the perpetuation of fossil energy will see their wealth and power decline or disappear.  For the planet as a whole, such a transition can’t come soon enough. Michael T. Klare, a TomDispatch regular, is a professor of peace and world security studies at Hampshire College and the author, most recently, of The Race for What’s Left. A documentary movie version of his book Blood and Oil is available from the Media Education Foundation. Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Book, Rebecca Solnit's Men Explain Things to Me, and Tom Engelhardt's latest book, Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World. -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

20 марта 2015, 01:18

Renewables Poised For Massive Growth In The Middle East

Growing scale in renewable energy projects has sharply reduced the price of sustainable energy to near parity with fossil fuels, creating new opportunities for energy companies but also for investors. This is the thrust of a report published this month by the National Bank of Abu Dhabi entitled "Financing The Future Of Energy," prepared by the University of Cambridge and PricewaterhouseCoopers. The report focuses on renewable energy prospects in the wider Gulf region – the ‘West-East corridor’ stretching from Africa into…

13 марта 2015, 20:44

Coal Is Dying: So What Should Sen. McConnell Really Do for Miners

Does Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell truly care about coal miners? In his latest attempt to fight all movement toward a clean economy - in theory to protect those workers - McConnell wrote an op-ed last week in the Lexington Herald-Leader where he encouraged the states to rebel against federal clean power regulations. He feared, he said, that the regulations would throw "countless" coal miners out of work. As the senior Senator from Kentucky, McConnell should absolutely worry about the coal industry. But the end of coal as an important global commodity is coming - not in the next few years, but it's coming fast. So the Senator is wasting his energies trying to stop progress and should instead help those who will be hurt by the shift. The world's leaders and businesses are moving toward aggressive action on climate change, and fossil fuels are the main target. But even if you deny the pressing need to decarbonize the world for our own safety, health, and economic growth, coal is in trouble. The economics of renewable energy are getting better very fast - the cost of solar power has dropped 80 percent in 6 years. A new study written by the University of Cambridge and PwC for the National Bank of Abu Dhabi (a region that has its own intense interest in fossil fuels) estimates that adding solar to the grid will cost the same as other options like coal - a point called "grid parity" - in 80% of countries in the next two years. This seismic shift in energy economics has begun to impact the traditional infrastructure, and investors are noticing. Last year, the bank Barclays downgraded the bonds of all US utilities, citing the disruption caused by "declining cost trends in distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) power and residential-scale power storage." The bank calculated that solar was already at, or nearing, grid parity in Hawaii, California, New York, and Arizona, with more states to come. Companies are increasingly taking advantage of these economics. A growing group of the world's biggest organizations are committing to (or are already) buying 100% of their energy from renewable power, including Apple, BT, IKEA, Honda, Nestle, Philips, SAP, Unilever, and Walmart. At the country level, the world's biggest buyers of coal are planning for a rapid decline. The most voracious energy user, China, is planning to cap coal use by 2020 and is rapidly expanding use of solar and wind power. The leading utilities around the world are not sitting still. German giant E.On is spinning off its fossil fuel assets to focus on the renewable future. And in the US, one of the largest coal burners, the utility NRG, announced a goal of cutting carbon emissions by 50% by 2030 and 90% by 2050. Coal is in trouble, so the real question is how we handle that fact. Senator McConnell could use his considerable power to help coal miners deal with the vast economic transition that's coming for their jobs, not just protect the short-term interests of his fossil fuel industry backers. In the US, the coal industry employs about 80,000 workers (50,000 below ground and 30,000 above). Imagine if the Senator from Kentucky created the McConnell Coal Sunset Fund, setting aside $80 billion to be spent over the next decade to help these people deal with an unstoppable economic transition. Each worker, as his or her job was eliminated, would get a $1 million fund (about 12 years of salary) to retrain them for other industries or to provide a pension for those near retirement. Eighty billion may sound like a lot of money, and it's not a small sum, but it is only 20% of the $400 billion being spent on the ill-fated F-35 fighter plane that the military doesn't really want. But positioned as an appropriate "thank you" to an industry that helped the country and the world move into modern times, the fund would be hard to vote against. Coal has no future in the U.S. - virtually none of the new energy capacity added to the grid in 2014 was coal-based (and 53% came from solar and wind). We have to deal with the reality that coal will disappear - it's not a matter of if, but when. Economic shifts are not nice to those working in the older technologies, but we can ease the transition. McConnell's op-ed worries about the "proud miners who just want to give their children a better life." There won't be coal jobs for those children. So let's stop wasting our time fighting all attempts to move our economy off of carbon-based fuels and actually help these people.

04 марта 2015, 18:21

«Банк Татарстан» посетил представитель Национального банка Абу Даби

Банк Татарстан Сбербанка России с деловым визитом посетил старший управляющий National Bank of Abu Dhabi Саиф AЛЬ ШЕХХИ.

Выбор редакции
28 ноября 2014, 23:57

Banks to arrange $1.5 billion loan for Egypt to repay foreign energy firms

CAIRO (Reuters) - HSBC , National Bank of Egypt and National Bank of Abu Dhabi will arrange a $1.5 billion syndicated loan to Egypt's state oil company in order for the country to pay back foreign...

Выбор редакции
28 ноября 2014, 21:09

WorldViews: Spain’s Real Madrid drops cross from logo to appease Gulf sponsors

 Spanish soccer heavyweight Real Madrid dropped the Christian cross affixed at the top of its  official crest after signing a lucrative sponsorship deal with the National Bank of Abu Dhabi. At an unveiling ceremony in the Gulf emirate earlier this week, the club's president, Florentino Perez, revealed a new credit card sponsored by the bank, which doubles as a Real Madrid club membership card. On the card, the club's iconic "Los Blancos" badge is missing the cross atop its royal crown. Read full article >>    

Выбор редакции
27 ноября 2014, 15:31

Real Madrid drop Christian cross from club crest in Middle East

• Real signed deal with National Bank of Abu Dhabi • Crest was originally designed in 1931Real Madrid have removed the traditional Christian cross from their official club crest after signing a lucrative three-year deal with the National Bank of Abu Dhabi.The crest, which was originally designed in 1931, usually contains a cross on top of a crown but that has been removed for use in the Middle East in order not to offend Muslim sensibilities in the region. The original design will continue to be used in Europe. Continue reading...

04 сентября 2014, 17:02

США: Goldman Sachs Group снова выпустит исламские облигации

По сведениям из осведомленных источников, американский банк Goldman Sachs Group намерен запустить новую программу выпуска исламских облигаций, номинированных в американских долларах. Отметим, что четыре банка, таких как Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank, Emirates NBD Capital, National Bank of Abu Dhabi и NCB Capital, а также подразделение самого Goldman Sachs будут заниматься размещением облигаций посредством компании специального назначения JANY Sukuk.