MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Negotiations in Mexico to update NAFTA have not made much progress on tough U.S. demands that could sink the 1994 trade pact, but the current round of talks are progressing with civility, some participants said on Saturday.
Negotiations in Mexico to update NAFTA have not made much progress on tough U.S. demands that could sink the 1994 trade pact but the current round of talks are progressing with civility, a well-placed source said on Saturday. Officials from the United States, Canada and Mexico are meeting in Mexico City for the fifth of seven planned rounds to update the North American Free Trade Agreement, which U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to withdraw from.
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Negotiators at high stakes talks to update NAFTA have so far kept their tempers but are not making much progress on tough U.S. demands that could sink the 1994 trade pact, a well-placed source said on Saturday.
US President Donald Trump has vowed to make the North American Free Trade Agreement better serve US interests, but Mexicans are concerned that cheap US imports are destroying Mexico's cultural relationship with its traditional maize varieties. Negotiators from the US, Mexico and Canada are in Mexico City to discuss the North American Free Trade Agreement, known as NAFTA. In this fifth round of talks, one of the big issues on the table is corn. It is Mexico's top agricultural import from the US. But some say cheap American varieties are damaging Mexico's rich and various maize heritage. Al Jazeera’s Julia Galiano reports from Mexico City. - Subscribe to our channel: http://aje.io/AJSubscribe - Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/AJEnglish - Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera - Check our website: http://www.aljazeera.com/
Глава мексиканского экономического ведомства отметил, что идет работа над созданием возможностей для заключения соглашения
NAFTA negotiators, take note.
U.S. energy exports to Mexico are booming. The termination of NAFTA could put this trend in jeopardy and harm U.S.-based firms. Meanwhile, an updated and expanded NAFTA could make North America more prosperous.
by Pierre Lemieux Some geographical conditions can be changed by human entrepreneurship or government intervention. If hothouses have been built with a government subsidy and their cost is sunk, don't they now represent a comparative advantage? A recent Wall Street Journal story reports that the longer growing season of Mexican farmers is seen as a cause of dumping and that a renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement may have to compensate for this comparative advantage of Mexico: American farmers, however, complain that their Mexican rivals enjoy unfair advantages, including low-cost farm labor, state subsidies and a year-round growing season that lets them dump cheap berries on the U.S. market when the two countries' growing seasons overlap in the late spring. Perhaps the reporter's or editor's interpretation was a bit loose (the reporter did not respond to my inquiry regarding whom exactly he was citing). But note how, in a similar way, French farmers complain against the unfair weather advantage of their Spanish competitors: French farmers and winegrowers dumped some two tons of peaches and nectarines in front of the Spanish consulate ... in order to denounce Spanish competition, deemed "unfair." ... For [a fruit growers' spokesman], "a European solution is needed." It is difficult to believe if you haven't seen it with your own eyes, but economic savvy is even less common in France than in America. This is a bit distressing nearly two centuries after French economist Frédéric Bastiat wrote his petition of candle makers disadvantaged by the competition of the sun. "If an orange from Lisbon sells for half the price of an orange from Paris, it is because the natural heat of the sun," Bastiat noted. In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith defended the importation of wine even if "[b]y means of glasses, hotbeds, and hot walls, very good grapes can be raised in Scotland, and very good wine too can be made of them." As he explained, domestic production would cost "about thirty times the expence for which at least equally good can be brought from foreign countries." Or, to borrow an example from William Taussig, very good pineapples could be grown in Maine with similar means. Geography, weather, and other natural conditions create justifiable comparative advantage in trade. Except if one is an ascetic, it is not rational to produce by oneself what somebody else can produce more cheaply in another climate. However - and here is a little challenge - the distinction between "natural" and "artificial" conditions is not as neat as one might think. Some geographical conditions can be changed by human entrepreneurship or government intervention. If hothouses have been built with a government subsidy and their cost is sunk, don't they now represent a comparative advantage? Ski resorts can be built and artificial snow made, possibly with government subsidies. Ignorant people can be instructed, even in government schools. Moreover, some phenomena straddle the distinction between the natural and the artificial, that is, phenomena like language, culture, and morals (see chapter 1 of Friedrich Hayek's vol. 1 of Law, Legislation and Liberty). The question is which features of the world count in comparative advantage? Swiss producers' strong work ethic and Canadians' use of English help determine their comparative advantage. Economies of scale benefit producers who have come to serve a larger market. Market institutions and a political system favorable to enterprise also help determine comparative advantage. But don't the Chinese government's subsidies and other assistance to Chinese businesses also help determine the latter's comparative advantage? Similarly, aren't the subsidies that aircraft maker Bombardier got from the Canadian and Québec governments now part of the company's comparative advantage? Such interrogations are related to an important argument made by Paul Krugman in an article later published in the Journal of Economic Literature ("What Should Trade Negotiators Negotiate About?" 35-3: 113-120). Krugman argued that government regulations and taxes are part of the comparative advantage landscape; they do change relative prices, but trade proceeds - and should be left to proceed - from that point on. This comprehensive concept of comparative advantage does not invalidate arguments against inefficient or immoral regulations, taxes, or subsidies. We may wish (often contra Krugman) that these measures do not exist in our own country, and try to persuade foreigners that they should not be subjected to them either. But they do not extinguish comparative advantage and negate all benefits from trade. Except perhaps in extreme cases (for example, trading in stolen goods, such as goods made with slave labor), a foreign governments' interventions do not justify another government prohibiting its own residents from trading with the regulated or subsidized foreigners. One can wish that one's trading partners were freer and thus more productive and wealthy, but it remains beneficial to trade with them, even if not as much as it would be in an ideal world where everybody were perfectly free. As Krugman suggests, this wide view of comparative advantage reconciles free trade and political decentralization at the world level. It is beneficial and possible to have both. On the one hand, political decentralization is necessary to preserve liberty and experimentation, as opposed to a world government. Different peoples can have different sets of regulations, including less regulation. There is no need to impose standards or regulatory harmonization in "free trade" agreements. On the other hand, the benefits of free trade are preserved because comparative advantage continues to exist under intervention, although with some distortions. The distortions introduced by a world government monopoly would certainly be worse. This line of argument supports the idea that unilateral free trade is beneficial: it is in the interest of (most of) a country's residents to be free to import at will whatever obstacles other national governments impose on their own citizens or subjects. Pierre Lemieux is an economist affiliated with the Department of Management Sciences of the Université du Québec en Outaouais. His forthcoming book, to be published by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, will aim at answering common objections to free trade. Email: [email protected] (5 COMMENTS)
После реконструкции причал сможет принимать три танкера одновременно. Литовская Klaipedos nafta, оператор терминалов нефтепродуктов и СПГ в Клайпеде, планирует инвестировать в реконструкцию причалов до 20,9 млн евро. Решение правления о реконструкции двух причалов, построенных в 1963-1964 годах, предложено утвердить акционерам на собрании 6 декабря, сообщили в компании. Согласно проекту, планируется осуществить дноуглубление до 17 метров, что позволит нефтетерминалу принимать одновременно не два, а три танкера. Klaipedos nafta намерена инвестировать в развитие терминала 49,5 млн евро, в том числе оборудовать 12 новых резервуаров для светлых нефтепродуктов, построить эстакаду для их разгрузки, проложить участок железной дороги. Государству принадлежат 72,32% акций Klaipedos nafta, концерну Achemos grupe – 10,24%.
"Мы оскорблены возмутительным решением и его реализацией. Роль министерства просвещения - в поощрении обучения и исследований, а не цензуре"
Auto hub San Luis Potosi believes it can survive the demise of the free-trade treaty that made it successful. Other places are less optimistic.
The American Petroleum Institute, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, and Mexican Association of Hydrocarbon Companies jointly reiterated their support for the North American Free Trade Agreement as its renegotiation resumed in Mexico City on Nov. 15. Their latest joint position paper also repeated the need to maintain robust investor protections to keep North American energy integration strong.
While NAFTA negotiations go into hiatus this article considers what a failure to renew the agreement might mean for professional workers who have work visas under the accord. Should they pray for a successful renewal or is there a backup plan they can go to?
Хиллари Клинтон объявила о том, что будет участвовать в президентских выборах, которые пройдут в США в следующем году. Стоит ли России ожидать очередной "перезагрузки" или нового витка обострения отношений, в случае если Клинтон победит на выборах?