• Теги
    • избранные теги
    • Компании1757
      • Показать ещё
      Разное603
      • Показать ещё
      Страны / Регионы319
      • Показать ещё
      Международные организации26
      • Показать ещё
      Формат29
      Показатели88
      • Показать ещё
      Издания30
      • Показать ещё
      Люди75
      • Показать ещё
      Сферы1
Tyson Foods
21 апреля, 08:20

Are We "Pretty Close" to Breaking Out?

Are We "Pretty Close" to Breaking Out?

14 апреля, 00:58

Trump Administration Hits Small Farmers With More Bad News

Farmers already concerned with President Donald Trump’s policies on trade and immigration just got another reason to worry. The U.S. Department of Agriculture this week delayed implementation of an Obama administration rule aimed at making it easier for livestock producers to sue the large meat-processing companies they contract with over abusive practices. The USDA Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyard Administration rule, proposed in 2010 and approved by the Obama administration in December, had been set to take effect later this month. The USDA postponed it for at least six months. The government delay was welcomed by industry groups, including the National Chicken Council, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and the National Pork Producers Council. The groups claim the rule would welcome frivolous, “government-sanctioned” lawsuits targeting corporations, and could raise prices for consumers and put farmers out of business. Colin Woodall, vice president for government affairs at National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, said his organization wants the rule eliminated altogether. “Our request to the Trump administration is that they withdraw this rule and throw it away,” Woodall told HuffPost. “We don’t believe there’s anything that can be done to fix it. We believe it’s bad across the board.” Influential members of Congress agree. Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kansas), the Senate Agriculture Committee chairman, this week called the rule “disastrous.” House Agriculture Chairman Mike Conaway (R-Texas) similarly criticized the rule last month. function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){'undefined'!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if('object'==typeof commercial_video){var a='',o='m.fwsitesection='+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video['package']){var c='&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D'+commercial_video['package'];a+=c}e.setAttribute('vdb_params',a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById('vidible_1'),onPlayerReadyVidible); The meat industry typically contracts with farmers to raise animals until they are old enough for slaughter. Farmers, particularly those in the highly consolidated poultry industry, have increasingly accused companies like Tyson Foods and Pilgrim’s Pride of deceptive and retaliatory practices. One lawsuit filed earlier this year called the companies a “cartel” and said they have colluded to depress pay for contractors, who are saddled with high debt that threatens their businesses. The industry rejects the allegations. “We’re hoping to bring about a change in this system,” a West Virginia farmer who has been raising chickens for Pilgrim’s Pride for 16 years, told The Associated Press this year. “It has to be done. If not, the American family farmer is going to disappear.” Lawsuits, however, run into the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, which courts have interpreted to require an extremely high burden of proof. Farmers suing companies must prove practices they’re forced to follow affect not just one farmer, but the entire industry. “It’s like if your house was burned down by an arsonist and you would have to show that all the houses in your neighborhood or city were impacted by that to prove you were damaged by the arson,” Paul Wolfe, senior policy specialist at the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, told HuffPost. “That’s very hard to do in any case.” The Obama rule would change that, and is long overdue, according to Barbara Patterson, director of government relations at the National Farmers Union, the nation’s second-largest farm organization. “This rule is such common sense and such a plain-language interpretation of the regulation that it’s hard to believe that they need more time,” Patterson said. “These are pretty basic protections and there has been plenty of time to review this. It should have been put into place eight years ago.” It remains unclear whether the Trump administration will scrap the rule. Trump’s pick for agriculture secretary, Sonny Perdue, hasn’t been confirmed by the Senate. A vote on his nomination has been scheduled for April 24. Supporters said they hope Perdue’s background as governor of Georgia — the biggest U.S. producer of broilers — shapes his thinking on the rule. Georgian Zippy Duvall, who served on Trump’s agriculture advisory committee and is president of the powerful American Farm Bureau Federation, recently expressed support for some aspects of the rule. “We hope that he [Perdue] has heard this story from the poultry farmers in his state, and hopefully that experience will help him rethink this decision that was made without him,” Wolfe said. Meanwhile, many farmers in rural communities who backed Trump’s presidency are growing anxious his administration will renege on campaign promises to make America great again. Sally Lee, program director at the Rural Advancement Foundation International-USA, told HuffPost the majority of the farmers she works with voted for Trump and believed his administration would be a boon for their communities.  “They felt sure this would be a no-brainer for the Trump administration, and there’s a lot of anxiety about this,” Lee said. “There’s a feeling that this is an action that does not reflect the commitment this administration made to rural America.” type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related... + articlesList=5731fca7e4b016f3789711df,566aa35ae4b080eddf57cedc,585d48ade4b0de3a08f508e8 ―- Joseph Erbentraut covers promising innovations and challenges in the areas of food, water, agriculture and our climate. Follow Erbentraut on Twitter at @robojojo. Tips? Email [email protected] -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

14 апреля, 00:58

Trump Administration Hits Small Farmers With More Bad News

Farmers already concerned with President Donald Trump’s policies on trade and immigration just got another reason to worry. The U.S. Department of Agriculture this week delayed implementation of an Obama administration rule aimed at making it easier for livestock producers to sue the large meat-processing companies they contract with over abusive practices. The USDA Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyard Administration rule, proposed in 2010 and approved by the Obama administration in December, had been set to take effect later this month. The USDA postponed it for at least six months. The government delay was welcomed by industry groups, including the National Chicken Council, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and the National Pork Producers Council. The groups claim the rule would welcome frivolous, “government-sanctioned” lawsuits targeting corporations, and could raise prices for consumers and put farmers out of business. Colin Woodall, vice president for government affairs at National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, said his organization wants the rule eliminated altogether. “Our request to the Trump administration is that they withdraw this rule and throw it away,” Woodall told HuffPost. “We don’t believe there’s anything that can be done to fix it. We believe it’s bad across the board.” Influential members of Congress agree. Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kansas), the Senate Agriculture Committee chairman, this week called the rule “disastrous.” House Agriculture Chairman Mike Conaway (R-Texas) similarly criticized the rule last month. function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){'undefined'!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if('object'==typeof commercial_video){var a='',o='m.fwsitesection='+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video['package']){var c='&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D'+commercial_video['package'];a+=c}e.setAttribute('vdb_params',a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById('vidible_1'),onPlayerReadyVidible); The meat industry typically contracts with farmers to raise animals until they are old enough for slaughter. Farmers, particularly those in the highly consolidated poultry industry, have increasingly accused companies like Tyson Foods and Pilgrim’s Pride of deceptive and retaliatory practices. One lawsuit filed earlier this year called the companies a “cartel” and said they have colluded to depress pay for contractors, who are saddled with high debt that threatens their businesses. The industry rejects the allegations. “We’re hoping to bring about a change in this system,” a West Virginia farmer who has been raising chickens for Pilgrim’s Pride for 16 years, told The Associated Press this year. “It has to be done. If not, the American family farmer is going to disappear.” Lawsuits, however, run into the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, which courts have interpreted to require an extremely high burden of proof. Farmers suing companies must prove practices they’re forced to follow affect not just one farmer, but the entire industry. “It’s like if your house was burned down by an arsonist and you would have to show that all the houses in your neighborhood or city were impacted by that to prove you were damaged by the arson,” Paul Wolfe, senior policy specialist at the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, told HuffPost. “That’s very hard to do in any case.” The Obama rule would change that, and is long overdue, according to Barbara Patterson, director of government relations at the National Farmers Union, the nation’s second-largest farm organization. “This rule is such common sense and such a plain-language interpretation of the regulation that it’s hard to believe that they need more time,” Patterson said. “These are pretty basic protections and there has been plenty of time to review this. It should have been put into place eight years ago.” It remains unclear whether the Trump administration will scrap the rule. Trump’s pick for agriculture secretary, Sonny Perdue, hasn’t been confirmed by the Senate. A vote on his nomination has been scheduled for April 24. Supporters said they hope Perdue’s background as governor of Georgia — the biggest U.S. producer of broilers — shapes his thinking on the rule. Georgian Zippy Duvall, who served on Trump’s agriculture advisory committee and is president of the powerful American Farm Bureau Federation, recently expressed support for some aspects of the rule. “We hope that he [Perdue] has heard this story from the poultry farmers in his state, and hopefully that experience will help him rethink this decision that was made without him,” Wolfe said. Meanwhile, many farmers in rural communities who backed Trump’s presidency are growing anxious his administration will renege on campaign promises to make America great again. Sally Lee, program director at the Rural Advancement Foundation International-USA, told HuffPost the majority of the farmers she works with voted for Trump and believed his administration would be a boon for their communities.  “They felt sure this would be a no-brainer for the Trump administration, and there’s a lot of anxiety about this,” Lee said. “There’s a feeling that this is an action that does not reflect the commitment this administration made to rural America.” type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related... + articlesList=5731fca7e4b016f3789711df,566aa35ae4b080eddf57cedc,585d48ade4b0de3a08f508e8 ―- Joseph Erbentraut covers promising innovations and challenges in the areas of food, water, agriculture and our climate. Follow Erbentraut on Twitter at @robojojo. Tips? Email [email protected] -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

10 апреля, 12:11

Trump’s Secret Weapon Against Obama’s Legacy

Using an obscure law called the Congressional Review Act, the president and his allies in Congress are quietly wiping out parts of his predecessor’s regulatory regime.

07 апреля, 13:26

Brief Study of T. Rowe Price Value Advisor Fund (PAVLX)

T. Rowe Price Value Advisor Fund (PAVLX) seeks long-term capital appreciation

05 апреля, 08:20

Beaten Up and Bought

Beaten Up and Bought

30 марта, 00:25

5 Consumer Staples Stocks with Strong Growth Prospects

These consumer staple stocks flaunt a Zacks Rank #1 or 2, with a Growth Style Score of A and have the potential to ride out the impending volatility.

29 марта, 17:13

Top Ranked Value Stocks to Buy for March 29th

Top Ranked Value Stocks to Buy for March 29th

28 марта, 16:30

The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: UnitedHealth Group, Tyson Foods, Seagate Technology, CGI Group and First Data

The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: UnitedHealth Group, Tyson Foods, Seagate Technology, CGI Group and First Data

27 марта, 15:48

Wall Street Spooked by Healthcare Vote: 5 Safe Value Picks

Volatility might rattle the markets again, reflecting uncertainty over Trump's pro-growth agenda at a time of above-average valuations.

24 марта, 19:39

No Chickens Were Harmed In The Making Of This Fried Chicken

The taste testers munched thoughtfully on the chicken tenders. “Delicious,” they said, if only a little spongier than usual. Most agreed they would eat it again. “It tastes like chicken,” one diner marvelled. “I went back for seconds,” said another. The chicken the group had devoured was unlike anything they’d ever eaten. It was chicken, alright, but chicken that had never once breathed, or clucked, or been slaughtered.  The chicken tenders were produced by Memphis Meats, a Silicon Valley-based food tech company that says it’s successfully developed the world’s first ever “clean” chicken and duck meat through cellular agriculture — in other words, they were grown in a lab.  Announcing the achievement last week, the company called it “an unprecedented milestone for the clean meat industry.” A ‘Historic’ Breakthrough The clean meat movement, though nascent, is not entirely new. Clean beef has been produced before — the first hamburger made from lab-grown beef was consumed in London in 2013 — but poultry had remained a challenge. In November, researchers at North Carolina State University said they’d successfully grown a “nugget” of turkey meat about the size of a finger tip in their lab, but the team has yet to announce the development of anything more substantial. Memphis Meats has now raised the bar with their lab-grown chicken and “slaughter-free” duck, which was served à l’Orange last week to the group of taste testers. “This is a historic moment,” Uma Valeti, co-founder and CEO of Memphis Meats, said of the company’s poultry breakthrough in a statement. “We really believe this is a significant technological leap for humanity, and an incredible business opportunity — to transform a giant global industry while contributing to solving some of the most urgent sustainability issues of our time.”  Chicken is the most consumed meat in the United States. In 2016, Americans gobbled up almost as much chicken as beef and pork combined, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Worldwide, more than 60 billion chickens are raised for meat annually. Duck, on the other hand, is enormously popular in China, home to 1.3 billion people. Some 2.7 million metric tons of duck meat are consumed there every year, reports the Wall Street Journal.  “Chicken and duck are at the center of the table in so many cultures around the world, but the way conventional poultry is raised creates huge problems for the environment, animal welfare, and human health,” said Valeti. “It is also inefficient. We aim to produce meat in a better way, so that it is delicious, affordable and sustainable.” The Meat Of The Matter Like Valeti, other clean meat advocates believe that lab-grown animal products could revolutionize the way we eat, increasing food security and making meat safer, greener and perhaps even healthier. They point to the health and safety issues that have plagued the conventional meat industry, particularly the large-scale factory farms where the majority of farm animals are now reared. Animal cruelty in these industrial facilities is one frequently-cited concern, as are health issues like antibiotic resistance. Cultured meat, advocates say, would share none of these problems, and could in fact be even healthier than their conventional counterparts. As Mark Post, the Dutch scientist behind the 2013 cultured hamburger patty, explained, lab-grown meat could be engineered to include certain nutrients like vitamins, while omitting “things we might not want in there” — like heme iron, which is found in beef and pork and has been linked to some cancers, and saturated fat. Then, there’s climate change and overpopulation, two of the most pressing global issues of this century. According to Post, a physiology professor at Maastricht University in The Netherlands, the clean meat industry could be one solution in tackling these twin crises.  “Livestock is currently responsible for about 15 to 20 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions,” he told The Huffington Post in a November interview. And that number is on the rise. Beef has a particularly large carbon footprint, as cows, through their farts and belches, produce a significant amount of methane — a greenhouse gas that is significantly more potent at trapping heat than carbon dioxide. Other livestock like chicken and pigs also produce methane through their manure, but in smaller amounts. Overall, livestock is the largest source of methane emissions worldwide, contributing over 35 percent of total emissions. According to the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization, emissions from enteric fermentation — which is the process through which methane is produced by livestock during digestion — increased 11 percent between 2001 and 2011. With scientists warning of the need to limit global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius this century, Post said replacing conventional meat with clean meat could potentially go a long way in helping us reach this goal. “Obviously, if you don’t use actual cows to produce beef, you won’t produce the methane,” he said. The full environmental impacts of clean meat production have yet to be rigorously researched, but the preliminary data is promising. Memphis Meats’ Valeti said last week that emissions from the cultured meat industry could be less than half that of conventional meat. A 2011 study was even more confident, concluding that clean meat could potentially be produced with up to 96 percent lower greenhouse gas emissions, 99 percent lower land use and 96 percent lower water use than the conventional meat industry. This deficit will be particularly important as global demand for meat increases, said Post. “Demand is going to go up and up in the next 30 years,” he said. “And we’re no longer going to able to sustain it.” According to the FAO, the world’s population is expected to increase to 9.6 billion people by 2050, and global consumption of meat is expected to balloon by 73 percent in that time. “In terms of food security, we’re already using 70 percent of all our arable land for livestock reproduction,” said Post, a beef-lover himself. “So either we all become vegetarian or we eat a lot less meat, but if we want to let people do their thing and eat what they want, we’re going to have to produce meat in a way that’s a lot less resource-intensive.”  How To Grow A Hamburger  Though it sounds like science fiction, Post said growing meat in a lab is “actually pretty simple,” and uses many of the same tissue engineering techniques that have been used for decades in human regenerative medicine.  Here are the basics: first, small samples of muscle tissue are taken from a live animal in what’s been called a “painless” procedure. From there, stem cells — “building block” cells with unique regenerative abilities — are harvested and left to culture in a special solution meant to feed the cells and promote growth. As the above Eater video explains, a single muscle stem cell can multiply into a trillion muscle cells in the right medium. These cells then merge together and form inch-long muscle fibers, which Post said are pretty much “exactly the same tissue” as what’s found in the meat we eat. These fibers are then layered together to create a product like a hamburger patty, which Post said takes about 10,000 muscle fibers — and about 8 to 9 weeks — to create. That production rate is pretty much fixed, said Post, as it’s based on the natural replication cycle of the stem cells. “You don’t want to mess with that,” he said. Post noted, however, that though two months may seem like a long time to culture a single hamburger patty, “it would take the same amount of time to create one hamburger or 100,000; it all just depends on the capacity you have to cultivate the cells.” And therein, say experts, lies the greatest difficulty facing the clean meat industry: scale. The technology is basically there, but “the biggest challenge is to get [cultured meat] produced on a mass scale and to get the price down,” Shaked Regev, chairman of the Modern Agriculture Foundation, a clean meat research group, told HuffPost last year. For now, almost every critical step of the meat culturing process remains expensive — from obtaining the starter stem cells to the culture medium, to the large bioreactors that scientists say will be needed to carry out culturing at an industrial level. Because of this, the cultured meat products that have been produced so far have come with exorbitant price tags. Post’s single beef patty cost $330,000 to produce in 2013. Three years later, Memphis Meats introduced its first-ever cultured meatball, which cost $18,000 per pound. And the chicken tenders they unveiled last week? A pound of it would set you back a finger-lickin’ $9,000. According to Erin Kim, communications director at New Harvest, another research institute dedicated to cultured meat, a lack of funding is currently the main obstacle to scaling up production.  “Funding in science in the U.S. is already really challenging right now and for novel, trailblazing areas like this, it poses a whole new challenge,” she said. “You have to convince people of the value of this work and because it’s so new, you don’t have a lot of hard data to point to.” All it’ll take is one “major breakthrough” in one part of the production process for a “game-changing” effect on the science, Kim added. “There are people out there who have the expertise [to make these breakthroughs happen], they just don’t have the funding right now to do it.” But as the clean meat industry garners more attention globally, support is burgeoning — including from an unlikely source. As the Wall Street Journal pointed out, big players in the conventional meat industry have started to show a keen interest in this new method of meat production. The most prominent example is Tyson Foods, the largest meat-processing company in the world, which launched a venture-capital fund in December to invest in high-tech products and research, including “meat grown from self-reproducing animal cells.” Tyson also bought a 5 percent stake in Beyond Meat, an alternative protein company, last year.  Kim said the clean meat industry welcomes the support from its conventional rival. “If we want cultured meat to be palatable to the general population, then who better to get it into the supply chain than [the big meat companies]?” she said, adding that it was analogous to Big Oil firms “looking into clean energy.”  “Oil is running out, so these companies know that if they want to stay in business, they have to look into renewables. I see the same thing potentially happening with meat producers. Demand [for meat] is growing and current methods aren’t going to be able to supply that need,” Kim said.  Schmeat Me In The Future  As the needle swings in their favor, many clean meat companies are working furiously to be the first to bring their products to market.  There are several working on the production of cultured beef and poultry, at least one focused on clean pork and others that are developing other animal products like eggs, milk and even leather. Memphis Meats told HuffPost this week that they are hoping to commercialize their cultured chicken and duck products by 2021.  “We are confident that we will be able to significantly reduce the cost of production,” David Kay, a business analyst at the company, said in an email. “We’ve already reduced the cost of production by more than 100-fold since we started our research. And while we might initially enter the market at a slight price premium, as we scale-up we are confident we will be able to produce meat at a price that is cost competitive with ― and ultimately more affordable than ― conventionally-produced meat.” Scientist Mark Post said commercial cultured meat is, within a doubt, in our near future. Demand for it will “eventually surpass livestock meat consumption,” he said, and even eventually “eradicate livestock meat consumption at some point.” “It’ll need to sink in for consumers ... but given all the moral and economic and environmental benefits, I cannot see a future where [clean meat] coexists with an inferior product,” he said. “Ask yourself: if 10 years from now, you see cultured meat products in the supermarket and the price is the same and it’s exactly the same in every way except it has no animal welfare issues or environmental issues, what are you going to do?” “ “Are you going to allow yourself to choose the product that is gnawing at your conscience?”    ______ Dominique Mosbergen is a reporter at The Huffington Post covering climate change, extreme weather and extinction. Send tips or feedback to [email protected] or follow her on Twitter.  type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Content + articlesList=56b12317e4b04f9b57d7a9b2,5652fcb5e4b0d4093a583db6,56539b38e4b0879a5b0c391b,561d1189e4b0c5a1ce607e86 -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

24 марта, 19:39

No Chickens Were Harmed In The Making Of This Fried Chicken

The taste testers munched thoughtfully on the chicken tenders. “Delicious,” they said, if only a little spongier than usual. Most agreed they would eat it again. “It tastes like chicken,” one diner marvelled. “I went back for seconds,” said another. The chicken the group had devoured was unlike anything they’d ever eaten. It was chicken, alright, but chicken that had never once breathed, or clucked, or been slaughtered.  The chicken tenders were produced by Memphis Meats, a Silicon Valley-based food tech company that says it’s successfully developed the world’s first ever “clean” chicken and duck meat through cellular agriculture — in other words, they were grown in a lab.  Announcing the achievement last week, the company called it “an unprecedented milestone for the clean meat industry.” A ‘Historic’ Breakthrough The clean meat movement, though nascent, is not entirely new. Clean beef has been produced before — the first hamburger made from lab-grown beef was consumed in London in 2013 — but poultry had remained a challenge. In November, researchers at North Carolina State University said they’d successfully grown a “nugget” of turkey meat about the size of a finger tip in their lab, but the team has yet to announce the development of anything more substantial. Memphis Meats has now raised the bar with their lab-grown chicken and “slaughter-free” duck, which was served à l’Orange last week to the group of taste testers. “This is a historic moment,” Uma Valeti, co-founder and CEO of Memphis Meats, said of the company’s poultry breakthrough in a statement. “We really believe this is a significant technological leap for humanity, and an incredible business opportunity — to transform a giant global industry while contributing to solving some of the most urgent sustainability issues of our time.”  Chicken is the most consumed meat in the United States. In 2016, Americans gobbled up almost as much chicken as beef and pork combined, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Worldwide, more than 60 billion chickens are raised for meat annually. Duck, on the other hand, is enormously popular in China, home to 1.3 billion people. Some 2.7 million metric tons of duck meat are consumed there every year, reports the Wall Street Journal.  “Chicken and duck are at the center of the table in so many cultures around the world, but the way conventional poultry is raised creates huge problems for the environment, animal welfare, and human health,” said Valeti. “It is also inefficient. We aim to produce meat in a better way, so that it is delicious, affordable and sustainable.” The Meat Of The Matter Like Valeti, other clean meat advocates believe that lab-grown animal products could revolutionize the way we eat, increasing food security and making meat safer, greener and perhaps even healthier. They point to the health and safety issues that have plagued the conventional meat industry, particularly the large-scale factory farms where the majority of farm animals are now reared. Animal cruelty in these industrial facilities is one frequently-cited concern, as are health issues like antibiotic resistance. Cultured meat, advocates say, would share none of these problems, and could in fact be even healthier than their conventional counterparts. As Mark Post, the Dutch scientist behind the 2013 cultured hamburger patty, explained, lab-grown meat could be engineered to include certain nutrients like vitamins, while omitting “things we might not want in there” — like heme iron, which is found in beef and pork and has been linked to some cancers, and saturated fat. Then, there’s climate change and overpopulation, two of the most pressing global issues of this century. According to Post, a physiology professor at Maastricht University in The Netherlands, the clean meat industry could be one solution in tackling these twin crises.  “Livestock is currently responsible for about 15 to 20 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions,” he told The Huffington Post in a November interview. And that number is on the rise. Beef has a particularly large carbon footprint, as cows, through their farts and belches, produce a significant amount of methane — a greenhouse gas that is significantly more potent at trapping heat than carbon dioxide. Other livestock like chicken and pigs also produce methane through their manure, but in smaller amounts. Overall, livestock is the largest source of methane emissions worldwide, contributing over 35 percent of total emissions. According to the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization, emissions from enteric fermentation — which is the process through which methane is produced by livestock during digestion — increased 11 percent between 2001 and 2011. With scientists warning of the need to limit global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius this century, Post said replacing conventional meat with clean meat could potentially go a long way in helping us reach this goal. “Obviously, if you don’t use actual cows to produce beef, you won’t produce the methane,” he said. The full environmental impacts of clean meat production have yet to be rigorously researched, but the preliminary data is promising. Memphis Meats’ Valeti said last week that emissions from the cultured meat industry could be less than half that of conventional meat. A 2011 study was even more confident, concluding that clean meat could potentially be produced with up to 96 percent lower greenhouse gas emissions, 99 percent lower land use and 96 percent lower water use than the conventional meat industry. This deficit will be particularly important as global demand for meat increases, said Post. “Demand is going to go up and up in the next 30 years,” he said. “And we’re no longer going to able to sustain it.” According to the FAO, the world’s population is expected to increase to 9.6 billion people by 2050, and global consumption of meat is expected to balloon by 73 percent in that time. “In terms of food security, we’re already using 70 percent of all our arable land for livestock reproduction,” said Post, a beef-lover himself. “So either we all become vegetarian or we eat a lot less meat, but if we want to let people do their thing and eat what they want, we’re going to have to produce meat in a way that’s a lot less resource-intensive.”  How To Grow A Hamburger  Though it sounds like science fiction, Post said growing meat in a lab is “actually pretty simple,” and uses many of the same tissue engineering techniques that have been used for decades in human regenerative medicine.  Here are the basics: first, small samples of muscle tissue are taken from a live animal in what’s been called a “painless” procedure. From there, stem cells — “building block” cells with unique regenerative abilities — are harvested and left to culture in a special solution meant to feed the cells and promote growth. As the above Eater video explains, a single muscle stem cell can multiply into a trillion muscle cells in the right medium. These cells then merge together and form inch-long muscle fibers, which Post said are pretty much “exactly the same tissue” as what’s found in the meat we eat. These fibers are then layered together to create a product like a hamburger patty, which Post said takes about 10,000 muscle fibers — and about 8 to 9 weeks — to create. That production rate is pretty much fixed, said Post, as it’s based on the natural replication cycle of the stem cells. “You don’t want to mess with that,” he said. Post noted, however, that though two months may seem like a long time to culture a single hamburger patty, “it would take the same amount of time to create one hamburger or 100,000; it all just depends on the capacity you have to cultivate the cells.” And therein, say experts, lies the greatest difficulty facing the clean meat industry: scale. The technology is basically there, but “the biggest challenge is to get [cultured meat] produced on a mass scale and to get the price down,” Shaked Regev, chairman of the Modern Agriculture Foundation, a clean meat research group, told HuffPost last year. For now, almost every critical step of the meat culturing process remains expensive — from obtaining the starter stem cells to the culture medium, to the large bioreactors that scientists say will be needed to carry out culturing at an industrial level. Because of this, the cultured meat products that have been produced so far have come with exorbitant price tags. Post’s single beef patty cost $330,000 to produce in 2013. Three years later, Memphis Meats introduced its first-ever cultured meatball, which cost $18,000 per pound. And the chicken tenders they unveiled last week? A pound of it would set you back a finger-lickin’ $9,000. According to Erin Kim, communications director at New Harvest, another research institute dedicated to cultured meat, a lack of funding is currently the main obstacle to scaling up production.  “Funding in science in the U.S. is already really challenging right now and for novel, trailblazing areas like this, it poses a whole new challenge,” she said. “You have to convince people of the value of this work and because it’s so new, you don’t have a lot of hard data to point to.” All it’ll take is one “major breakthrough” in one part of the production process for a “game-changing” effect on the science, Kim added. “There are people out there who have the expertise [to make these breakthroughs happen], they just don’t have the funding right now to do it.” But as the clean meat industry garners more attention globally, support is burgeoning — including from an unlikely source. As the Wall Street Journal pointed out, big players in the conventional meat industry have started to show a keen interest in this new method of meat production. The most prominent example is Tyson Foods, the largest meat-processing company in the world, which launched a venture-capital fund in December to invest in high-tech products and research, including “meat grown from self-reproducing animal cells.” Tyson also bought a 5 percent stake in Beyond Meat, an alternative protein company, last year.  Kim said the clean meat industry welcomes the support from its conventional rival. “If we want cultured meat to be palatable to the general population, then who better to get it into the supply chain than [the big meat companies]?” she said, adding that it was analogous to Big Oil firms “looking into clean energy.”  “Oil is running out, so these companies know that if they want to stay in business, they have to look into renewables. I see the same thing potentially happening with meat producers. Demand [for meat] is growing and current methods aren’t going to be able to supply that need,” Kim said.  Schmeat Me In The Future  As the needle swings in their favor, many clean meat companies are working furiously to be the first to bring their products to market.  There are several working on the production of cultured beef and poultry, at least one focused on clean pork and others that are developing other animal products like eggs, milk and even leather. Memphis Meats told HuffPost this week that they are hoping to commercialize their cultured chicken and duck products by 2021.  “We are confident that we will be able to significantly reduce the cost of production,” David Kay, a business analyst at the company, said in an email. “We’ve already reduced the cost of production by more than 100-fold since we started our research. And while we might initially enter the market at a slight price premium, as we scale-up we are confident we will be able to produce meat at a price that is cost competitive with ― and ultimately more affordable than ― conventionally-produced meat.” Scientist Mark Post said commercial cultured meat is, within a doubt, in our near future. Demand for it will “eventually surpass livestock meat consumption,” he said, and even eventually “eradicate livestock meat consumption at some point.” “It’ll need to sink in for consumers ... but given all the moral and economic and environmental benefits, I cannot see a future where [clean meat] coexists with an inferior product,” he said. “Ask yourself: if 10 years from now, you see cultured meat products in the supermarket and the price is the same and it’s exactly the same in every way except it has no animal welfare issues or environmental issues, what are you going to do?” “ “Are you going to allow yourself to choose the product that is gnawing at your conscience?”    ______ Dominique Mosbergen is a reporter at The Huffington Post covering climate change, extreme weather and extinction. Send tips or feedback to [email protected] or follow her on Twitter.  type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Content + articlesList=56b12317e4b04f9b57d7a9b2,5652fcb5e4b0d4093a583db6,56539b38e4b0879a5b0c391b,561d1189e4b0c5a1ce607e86 -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

24 марта, 19:02

SUPERVALU Takes Initiatives to Boost Sales: Time to Hold?

Grocery retailer, SUPERVALU Inc. (SVU) has been in troubled waters for the past one year due to tough competitive pressure, deflationary environment in the food industry and soft sales in the retail segment.

Выбор редакции
23 марта, 14:14

Top Ranked Value Stocks to Buy for March 23rd

Top Ranked Value Stocks to Buy for March 23rd

22 марта, 15:52

5 Ultra-Safe Stocks to Counter the Worst Sell-Off in 5 Months

The Dow Jones and the S&P 500 lost over 1% for the first time in more than 100 trading sessions.

09 марта, 17:31

Tyson Farm Bird Flu Found Less Menacing than Chinese Variant

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that the bird flu virus detected at one of Tyson Foods Inc.'s (TSN) farm poses lesser threat to humans.

09 марта, 10:14

Tyson Foods (TSN) Down 4.3% Since Earnings Report: Can It Rebound?

Tyson Foods (TSN) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues.

07 марта, 18:10

Company News for March 07, 2017

Companies in the News are: GM,DAL,DBK,TSN

Выбор редакции
07 марта, 17:29

Top Ranked Growth Stocks to Buy for March 7th

Top Ranked Growth Stocks to Buy for March 7th

Выбор редакции
07 марта, 01:54

Tyson Foods' stock plunges

Tyson Foods's shares dive after a strain of bird flu was detected in a chicken breeder flock on a Tennessee farm contracted to the U.S. food giant. Fred Katayama reports. Subscribe: http://smarturl.it/reuterssubscribe More updates and breaking news: http://smarturl.it/BreakingNews Reuters tells the world's stories like no one else. As the largest international multimedia news provider, Reuters provides coverage around the globe and across topics including business, financial, national, and international news. For over 160 years, Reuters has maintained its reputation for speed, accuracy, and impact while providing exclusives, incisive commentary and forward-looking analysis. http://reuters.com/ https://www.facebook.com/Reuters https://plus.google.com/u/0/s/reuters https://twitter.com/Reuters